25 June 2009 in Humor | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
24 June 2009 in Humor | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
So that's how we girls are. When we were mortal, we used men to get our meals. Now, we use men to get our meals. Unlike male vampires, our victims don't die and come back to life, Thus, we never get detected. Our kind has worked the crowd for centuries and escaped detection unlike our male counterparts. And those of us that prefer women, those meals eventually do join us. Literally. They cross over to the other side with a little persuasion, a little curiosity. But once they shift gears in this realm, there's no going back. Unless we like them, in that special way, we don't frequent them to feed. No need, no feed. No feed, no bleed. A girl can only bleed so much. If they bleed enough, they change: forever. We are very selective about who we spend eternity with. If a guy falls for us, turn him down enough and he get the idea we like girls. All the better for him. Men only bleed so much to so we don't try and tap them out. Men are such pigs anyway. That's why they're always getting staked out. They get over sure of themselves. They still feel adrenaline, especially the young ones. So foolish. It's a good distraction from us. Leaves us free to roam at night, earn a little money to pay the rent. The smart ones hold down jobs. The dumb ones roll their Johns and eventually get caught. A girl's gotta be careful you know...especially at night.
To Be Continued...
15 June 2009 in L.U.V. At Night | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Stoner's Island
Think about it...
Here we have an isolated group in the wilderness. Not much different from a bunch of hippies in a commune.
And of this group, we have the equivalent of a stripper(Ginger), Timothy Leary (no doubt the Professor whipped up some LSD merely using a coconut and a palm frond or a bong from bambo and volcanic rock), add to that an extremely wealthy reclusive tax evader, (you can guess on that one), a butch, and two men living in one tent (the precursor of civil unions). The picture below the cast no doubt was what Sherwood Schwartz in a drunken stupor derived his inspiration.
Their only communication with the outside world was a radio with a battery that never went dead and a three hour trip (tour) went on for three years short of them finding an island with an abandoned bomb testing site that was the setting of "The New People" circa 1968 TV vintage.
So, Ginger was dancing at Club Marianne on a bamboo pole, while the professor was whipping up narcotics to reimburse the millionare backer of the club. The alternate gender preference couple set about to do the menial labor. So, how does a strip club survive on a desert island without customers with exception of the occasional head hunters that frequented the island? Howell was pretty good at laundering money, eh?
15 June 2009 in Film | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
10 June 2009 in Newsfeed | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
10 June 2009 in Newsfeed | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Israeli attack on USS Liberty
By Alan Sabrosky
June 08, 2009 "Information Clearing House" -- Americans respond badly to treachery. This may explain why they went into WWII against Nazi Germany with determination but against Imperial Japan with rage, even though Hitler was decidedly the more vicious enemy. The reason lay in Japan’s surprise attack on the US naval base at Pearl Harbor, described by then-President Roosevelt as "a date which will live in infamy."
The Attack
Less catastrophic but more treacherous and deserving of infamy was the deliberate Israeli air and naval attack upon the USS Liberty, a clearly marked naval intelligence ship, on June 8, 1967. After several hours of aerial surveillance, unmarked aircraft attacked the USS Liberty with gunfire, rockets and napalm. This was followed by an attack by three motor torpedo boats, firing torpedoes and then machine-gunning the ship, its crew and their lifeboats. The ship managed to get out a call for help under extraordinary circumstances, but was nearly sunk, and more than 200 American sailors and Marines were killed or wounded. Israel claimed it was a case of mistaken identity, and the US Government accepted that explanation.
Both lied, and Israel’s lies become evident when one examines the profiles of the USS Liberty and the Egyptian ship the Israelis supposedly thought they were attacking, plus a photo of the USS Liberty itself. Misidentification in a December gale in the North Atlantic might have been possible. On a June day in the Eastern Mediterranean, never, at least by any pilot with the visual acuity to take off and land his aircraft:
Remember that in 1967, Israel’s fighters and motor torpedo boats had to get close to use their on-board weapons against a target. Anyone seeing the radars and electronic arrays on the USS Liberty knew this was not some Egyptian tramp steamer. Finally, there is the USN designation "GTR5" on both sides of the bow & the stern, with the number larger than the letters -- anyone approaching the ship close enough to attack cannot miss that designation, and know that this was a US Navy ship.
Why the Attack
But the Israelis attacked anyway, and tried very hard to sink the ship without any survivors while concealing their own identity. They were aided and abetted by US President Lyndon Johnson and Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, who personally recalled separate flights of fighters launched from the 6th Fleet’s aircraft carriers USS Saratoga and USS America, fighters whose arrival over the USS Liberty would have saved most American lives and cost the Israelis a number of aircraft and motor torpedo boats.
What Johnson and McNamara did is appalling. As a Marine who served in Vietnam, I have always despised them for their arrogance and incompetence. After understanding their role in the USS Liberty tragedy, I now despise them twice over for their cowardice and their dereliction of duty, and for giving precedence to a domestic Jewish lobby and their own political interests over the lives of Americans in uniform.
At the very least, both were indictable accessories after the fact in the murder at sea of 34 Americans and a breach of international law, in open violation of their own oaths of office.
So why did the Israelis do it? One possibility is that for them, it was simply business as usual. Israel has a long history of attacking anything in its path – a civilian airliner, UN posts and officials, refugee camps, hospitals, the lot -- and then denying culpability, so the question is not "why," but "why not?" Another was to dispose of inconvenient witnesses to the murder of Egyptian prisoners and civilians at El Arish.
A third was to cloak their strategy of involving Jordan so as to take East Jerusalem and the West Bank. And a fourth was to show other Arab countries that they had such influence in the US that they could do it and get away with it, and perhaps involve the US militarily on their side.
Fixing Things
Any of these would have sufficed. What is important to note is that the Israelis had no qualms about deliberately killing Americans and concealing their own identity, doubtless hoping to bring the US in on their side openly attacking Egypt -- they won handily anyway, but they could not be certain of doing so at the beginning of the war. It is something to keep in mind as a possible precedent when we look later at the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001 and made the US an active belligerent intent on destroying Israel’s enemies.
The tale of the USS Liberty needs to reach the American people. It needs to reach them in a medium that will convey the calculated nature of the attack and the outrage it should evoke. And it should conclude with the statements of so many people in positions of authority at the time who said categorically that the attack was deliberate, and of survivors who lost shipmates there and likewise are convinced that the attack was deliberate and that their own government abandoned them at the time of the attack, and betrayed them afterwards.
Few events are so calculated to enrage Americans as the image of a US ship being deliberately attacked and Americans being killed and wounded by a supposed ally, for its own local purposes. That this "ally's" influence in the US government was so great that a US president ordered back fighters whose arrival would have prevented most of the 200 casualties on the USS Liberty from occurring would compound that outrage. And that this influence allowed Israel both to evade retribution at the time and to conceal knowledge of what happened from the American people, would add insult to compound outrage.
This is the factually accurate message Americans need to see and hear, and it is a message that could impact sharply on what members of Congress -- whose jobs depend on votes even more than they do on Jewish money -- would be prepared to do to or for Israel. It could also give President Obama political room for diplomatic maneuver IF he seriously would like to reorient the way the US does its business in the Middle East.
AIPAC, its cohorts and the hasbara crowd will howl. There will be the usual flurry of fabrications, denials, falsehoods, fear-mongering, character assassination and disinformation that is their specialty. But at the end of the day, more and more Americans will see graphic portrayals of an American ship attacked -- and especially of uniformed Americans killed and wounded -- by a foreign country named Israel, whose domestic clout within the United States in 1967 allowed them to do it with impunity, and whose extended clout since that time has already produced one American tragedy (9/11), taken the US into two wars (Afghanistan and Iraq) and is pointing the US towards two more wars (Iran and Syria). And there is a good chance that a growing number of Americans will say, "Enough! Never again...." and make things happen. Let us begin.
Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College. He can be contacted at docbrosk@comcast.net.
09 June 2009 in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
http://www.onpointradio.org/2009/06/douglas-rushkoffs-life-inc
Rushkoff thinks we got off track as a society a ways back. About 400 years back.
He’s not against capitalism. But the form we fell into –corporate capitalism – is killing us, he says. Killing values and communities. Turning us into the “brand that is me.” Turning homes into investments and 401k balances into cold barometers of success or failure.
This runs contrary to what we've been taught in history, and most social studies classes as the the validity and reality of government,politics and money. The show ran about 40 minutes but is amazing how Kings losing wealth to the middle class passed monopoly laws for corporations sanctioned by the king resulting in the current system we are slaves to.
02 June 2009 in Economics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
"You might be a Redneck if you think "Swine Flu" if the past tense of "Pigs Fly."
James Robert Fellabaum
As of: 4PM 29 April 2009
Pandemic Flu/2009 H1-N1 Flu Info:
Association of State and Territorial Health Officers (ASTHO)
Flu State Updates:
http://www.astho.org/templates/display_pub.php?pub_id=3797&admin=1
BBC World Map (H1-N1 progress)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8021547.stm
DHHS (US Department of Health and Human Services)
Public Health Emergency Declaration: http://www.hhs.gov/secretary/phe_swh1n1.html
DHHS/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Tools and Resources for Influenza Preparedness http://www.ahrq.gov/prep/swineflu.htm
DHHS/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC):
Main H1-N1 Flu Web Link: http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/
Case Counts: http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/investigation.htm
Guidance and Recommendations: http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/recommendations
Influenza General Resources http://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic/
Info Phone Line: 1-800-CDC-INFO (1-800-232-4636)
Key Facts: www.cdc.gov/swineflu/key_facts.htm
Media Brf Transcripts: http://www.cdc.gov/media/transcripts/2009/t090426.htm
Seasonal Flu Overview http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/
Travel Updates/Guidance. http://wwwn.cdc.gov/travel/contentSwineFluTravel.aspx
“Widgets” (Including Swine Flu Widget). http://www.hhs.gov/web/library/index.html
DHHS/Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Emergency Use Authorization Summary. http://www..fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2009/NEW02002.html
DHHS/National Library of Medicine
Swine Flu Resources. http://sis.nlm.nih.gov/enviro/swineflu.html
DHHS/Pandemic Flu.Gov
http://www.pandemicflu.gov/index.html
Federal and world response stages: http://www.pandemicflu.gov/plan/federal/fedresponsestages.html
H1-N1 Frequently Asked Questions:
http://pandemicflu.gov/faq/swineflu/
Use of Pneumococcal Vaccine http://www.pandemicflu.gov/vaccine/pneumococcal.html
State-by-State Pandemic Planning and status: http://www.pandemicflu.gov/plan/states/index.html#stateplans
Department of Homeland Security (DHS):
Flu Updates. http://www.dhs.gov/xprepresp/programs/swine-flu.shtm
DHS/FEMA:
FEMA Assistance for Pan Flu: http://www.fema.gov/government/grant/pa/9523_17.shtm
Google Maps Swine Flu Tracking Tool: http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&t=p&msa=0&msid=106484775090296685271.0004681a37b713f6b5950&ll=32.639375,-110.390625&spn=15.738151,25.488281&z=5
International Association of Emergency Managers (IAEM)
Spanish Language reports/resources/information. http://www.iaem.es/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=616&Itemid=208
Masks and PPE:
http://www.osha.gov/dsg/guidance/stockpiling-facemasks-respirators.html
http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/guidance_homecare.htm
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2007/NEW01630.html
http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/guidelines_infection_control.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/masks.htm
Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Guidance/Tng Documents for Hospital PPE Issues.
http://www.sccm.org/Public_Health_and_Policy/Disaster_Resources/Pages/default.aspx
Mexican Department of Health:
Office of Personnel Management (HR and US Govt personnel Issues):
www.opm.gov/oca/compmemo/2008/2008-09.asp
Advice to Federal Employees and Agencies on Preventing the Spread of the Current Flu and Maintaining Readiness to Use HR Flexibilities if Necessary
http://www.chcoc.gov/Transmittals/TransmittalDetails.aspx?TransmittalId=2227
http://www.chcoc.gov/Transmittals/Index.aspx
Pan American Health Organization:
Main Site: http://new.paho.org/hq/index.php?lang=en
Flu Page: http://new.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=805&I temid=569
Public Health Agency of Canada
PHAC Swine Flu information:
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/alert-alerte/swine_200904-eng.php
Travel Health Warning:
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/tmp-pmv/2009/hsf-mexico-090427-eng.php
Information on Government of Canada actions:
http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/media/nr-rp/2009/2009_0427_a-eng.php
General Influenza Information:
http://www.fightflu.ca/index-eng.html
US Dpt of Agriculture
Swine Flu FAQs.
http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usdahome?contentidonly=true&contentid=2009/04/0131.xml
US Dpt of Labor/Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA):
Healthcare workers and workplace guidance. http://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA_pandemic_health.pdf
Workplace Guidance. http://www.osha.gov/Publications/influenza_pandemic.html
World Health Organization:
Pandemic Alert System/Levels: http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/phase/en/index.html
Swine Flu Page: http://www..who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/en/index.html
29 April 2009 in Health | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The Culmination Of Technology In My Life I invented the ghetto blaster. Let's start from the beginning. Back in the day when the phone company ran wires in your house and gave you one phone, to have anoter phone was illegal unless you leased another. Around sixth or seventh grade I proceeded to attach a microphone to alligator clips and attach it to the incoming wires. I could hear the other person barely. The power draw was such that everyone else could barely hear each other, but I did it. Eventually my cousin Bill (that again is a story for another time) brought a phone dial (yes, we did not always have pushbuttons) over that a phone man left for his younger sister and I proceeded to mount the dial into a cigar box (a 2 x 4 x 8 inch cardboard box that I believe cigars are still displayed in) after painting it black and added a toggle on/off switch and wired in the microphone. PRESTO! I had a phone. Eventually my father brought home discarded office phones which I painted competition orange and changed the numbers on the dial from number to roman numerals for an artistic flare. I had an electronic science kit that showed how to make a numerical clicking circuit that I could have probably used to design and build a prototype push button phone that mimmicked the clicks of the dial to dial numbers. In 1980 that phone could be bought for 12 dollars from Radio Shack. But I could have still had it years in advance and perhaps patented the idea and been rich today. Oh, touch tone. Ooops, phone company beat me again, damn! As time went on my interest shifted to music as it does with most teenagers and I had a transistor (yeah, that thing between tubes and microcircuits) that measures 1x2x4 inches. It used the 9 volt battery that ran for awhile but was portable to the point that since no one paid me much mind in seventh grade I could poke a hole in my shirt behind the pocket and run the ear phone up and listed to the radio in class. Hmmmmm not unlike kids with iPods today. Eventually I tired of buying 9 volt batteries. Also, I tired of testing 9 volt batteries with my tounge to see if they were still good. So, I took the good old cigar box phone apart and replaced the dial with the radio. I took the radio apart and where the tuner was, adjusted the screws to bring in WIXI Peaceburgh USA in the strongest. For some reason I was never into KQV or Jim Quinn. Burghers remember the Mighty Quinn song that he used as his shows theme. So on the cigar box that I painted gloss black I attached a competition orange WIXI Peaceburgh sticker with peace symbol and all. Now for the technical innovation. In the other side of the cigar box I installed a 6 volt camper batterry. I used the toggle switch to turn the radio on and off and positioned the radio on the side such that the tuner could be reached should need be. It lasted forever. Never again was I a slave to buying 9 volt batteries. Back in school, my seventh grade geography teacher came over one morning and squeezing my shoulders tightly started to ask the class if I wore a hearing aid. Fortunately that day I no longer had the radio. Ha! Got away with it. However, I I could have figured out a way to pull the radio from it's case, and I now know I could have used a double A battery as most Walkmans do today and miniturized it somewhat and still been able to listen to Top 40 radio as I daydreamed out the window. Fast forward to the year 2008 and the end of the Presidential election and the onset of the latest economic depression to occur in my life. During the election I had liberty to wear a walkman and keep in touch with news to be an informed voter and listen to NPR (to those of you reading this in the future, that was a public donation and grant funded carrier wave news information network) to keep up on news, politics and economics as openly pro Israel (a nuclear power that used to exist in the middle east that got too self centered and was finally defeated and absorbed through it's own arrogance.) So between listening at work and on my day off during the middle of the week since gasoline (a carbon based liquid that exploded in small chambers to move something called a car) went over 4 dollars a unit gallon (and 4 dollars was about one half to one third an average citizens hourly wage and that 4 dollar amount would only propel one about 20 miles (40 kilometers) I was able to learn of economic opportunities. In particular, a company in Las Vegas through which I amassed my vast fortune during the depression of 2009. Having learned from the market crash of 1999, that the best time to buy a meal was when you weren't really hungry and the food wasn't very rich I proceeded to buy stock in the depression of 2009. Now the technology came to my aid. As gas prices dropped I lost the option of a 10 hour day 4 day work week. And, we were no longer allowed the use of personal electronics. While most used them to download songs I was listening to radio. So, buying a small digital recorder (where else, Radio Shack) I set up a poor mans TIVO (don't ask, it went the way of the DoDo) and then laborously listened in the evening hours scanning the days news for items not given over the network trash broadcast. Problem. Once again I was beseiged by the plague of the 9 volt battery. This time in the form of a triple A battery. I was going through them like cracy. The digital recorders sucked them dry. I got a recharger, but the results werre less than optimum disirability. Enter the SANSA from SanDisk. The same company I believe that made memory chips for my phone (don't ask) and was the third generation floppy disk. So, not only was this iPod generic device also a digital recorder, it had radio build in AND was rechargeable. Three birds with one stone! Wow. No longer would there be a tangle of wires in my car linking multiple devices (kleoughing??) to get the desirable technology, but, no batteries. It was rechargeable. I have found heaven. And, not only did I have storage of the files, but I could also archive them. So one day all an archeologist wanting to listen to 21st century financial news would need to do is dig up a 1962 Volkswagon Beetle like Woody Allen and plug it into the cigarette lighter. Woody Allen, Beetle, Cigarette? Don't ask.
16 April 2009 in Serial Story Installment | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Some Place Called Monessen... Here it is, my home town: Belle Vernon, Pa. Over that hill is Monessen, and actually Donora. The source of more recent maternal ancestry. To the lower right is St. Sebastian's Parochial School. To the left along Broad Ave. (not noted for Broads as 5th Avenue in downtown Pittsburgh was) is the convent where those particular Broads lived. Some were cool in my prepubescent days of grades 1-6 at St. Sebastian's prior to my parole. Some were not. None of the abuse currently the fodder of numerous lawsuits against the Catholic Church, just good old fashioned Calvinism. You know, can't answer the question... make sure you are not standing too close to the wall nor to far as you needed something to stop you in mid air. You'll notice the Starship Enterprise in the sky above St. Sebastians. Phasers on full. Get those nuns. My cousin Bill from Monessen (that's another story) and I climbed to the water tower on the hill overlooking the town and in the day prior to digital photography and using a fishing pole and a slightly off focus SLR camera took this picture. Actually, back in our youth, cousin Bill and I scaled the monstrous hill you see in this picture. Our sense of adventure of climbing steep slopes and crossing railroad tracts was suddenly deflated as he informed me "Oh, Elks club pool." But another interesting side story, across from the Nun's Convent about the middle of the picture is Ferguson's Funeral Home where many a relative have been viewed. During my father's viewing, a nun came in to pay respects and my brother began immediately sucking up to Sister Mary Agony. "You were my favorite nun." At this point she looked over at me and said, "And I remember you" to which I stared blankly back, blinked, glanced over at Cousin Bill and said "No, I don't remember you... You must have hit me in the head with a ruler too many times".
So, just were was this den of parochial indoctrination? To the right of the church is the upper level of the school grades 6-8. But, beneath the the actual church, contrary to the popular misconception that it houses the printing presses to make bingo cards lie rooms for grades 1-4.
On my last visit I toured the outside looking down to the windows I spent sooooo much time daydreaming out of. On of the videos I narrated was the story that occurred around the time Gilligan's Island motion picture trading cards were the rage. Collect a series and fan them rapidly and Gilligan swung a golf club. Classmate Jim McKevitt who started working at McDonald's and later becoming a manager (maybe it was Burger Chef or Winky's or one of those Pennsylvania off brands) was playing guitar and featured in the local newspaper with his brother playing Winchester Cathedral. So it was one day after recess that an enraged nun lined all the second graders up and took us into the bathroom one at a time. I know this drill well having my mouth filled with bar soap on numerous occasions for the inopportune use of profanity which was fairly common place dialogue in the Fellabaum household. So, wait, wait, wait, finally my turn. Leading me into the restroom and swinging open the stall door I beheld the source os rage for Sister Rose Alma.
Between the confined of the door of the stall and the conical edge of the toilet was a long brown turd measuring in my best estimate at that age a whopping 7.5 inches. In retrospect with my current knowledge of the pediatric gut tract I would have had no way of knowing such a length of flocculent compressed matter could exist inside of let alone progress forth from a second or first grader all in one piece. I told the nun that I had been in the adjacent stall but that she might want to seek out a first grader named Mickey. That was the last I heard of the matter or thought of it until my walk down memory lane at the institution that laid the ground work for my future academic pursuits.
Recently I received a phone call and some emails regarding my 35th (huhhhh?) high school class reunion. 35th? Doh!
01 April 2009 in Serial Story Installment | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
In a small storefront in Sarasota across from South Gate Mall is a quite getaway with great food. Sushi, sashime, several grilled delicacies and a wide assortment of beverages
makes Kazu's a great place for that early date.
One thing I always look for when I visit a sushi establishment is the freshness of the wasabi. And fresh it is.
I have been a frequent visitor for the past two years... and highly recommend it to all.
23 March 2009 in Food and Drink | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
March 18, 2009Military.com|by Bryant Jordan
The [U.S.] Army has let slip one of the worst-kept secrets in the world -- that Israel has the bomb.
Check out this link for the story by Bryant Jordan http://www.military.com/news/article/March-2009/us-army-confirms-israeli-nukes.html?col=1186032310810
19 March 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The Israel Lobby Gets Its Man—And Tips Its Hand.
By Philip Weiss
March 19, 2009 "The American Conservative <http://www.amconmag.com/article/2009/mar/23/00006/>" -- -Charles Freeman Jr.’s withdrawal of his acceptance of a high-level intelligence position in the Obama administration was a national-security drama more riveting than an episode of "24." The moral was clear: even a president who owes his job to a progressive movement in American politics could not support a longtime public servant who had made the mistake of criticizing Israel. Fierce advocates of the Jewish state, notably Sens. Chuck Schumer and Joe Lieberman and Reps. Eric Cantor and Steve Israel, played important roles in Freeman’s exit, while present and former officials of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee flitted in and out of the wings.
The message to all office-seekers is obvious. "They want to kill the chicken to scare the monkeys. They want other people to be intimidated," Freeman told The American Conservative just before he withdrew his name to be chairman of the National Intelligence Council. He went on, "If the administration does not stick with me, then it’s destroying the argument that the Israel lobby is only a mythic entity and does not control the public space. … It will show the world that it is not able to exercise independent thinking on these issues."
I believe that the inability of the American public to discuss, or the government to consider, any option for U.S. policies in the Middle East opposed by the ruling faction in Israeli politics has allowed that faction to adopt and sustain policies that ultimately threaten the existence of the state of Israel. It is not permitted for anyone in the United States to say so.
Freeman openly admires Israel: "The good has outweighed the bad in Israel for a long time. I would like to see Israel survive and prosper. Right now it is doing itself in and taking us with it." Years ago, he became aware of how fierce adherence to Israel in our political class was damaging both nations. "I came to all this really very late," he says. "I was an admirer of what I thought was a humane society in Israel. What really got me was when I was in Abu Dhabi many years ago and turned on the local TV. There was a home video of two Israeli plainclothesmen pulling a Palestinian teenager out of his house and kicking him in the head, and when he was semiconscious, they shot him in the back of the head. And the same story was on the back page of the English language newspaper, with six panels from the video. I thought, when this hits the U.S. press, all hell will break loose. Well, it didn’t ever hit our press. The self-censorship extended to a point that it was really dangerous to our society."
The drama began on Feb. 19, when the Foreign Policy blog reported that Blair, a retired Navy admiral, was planning to name Freeman to chair the National Intelligence Council, which sorts out the reports of the many intelligence agencies and presents them to the White House. In 2007, one of its assessments, concluding that Iran had halted its nuclear-weapons program following the invasion of Iraq, chilled the neoconservative drive to attack Iran. "No one has ever made the case that it’s a primary policy-making role," says William Quandt, the longtime expert on the Middle East.
Freeman is hardly a cipher. An outspoken and formidable thinker firmly in the realist camp, he spent four decades in the State Department marked by his poise in the presence of heads of state. In 1972, at age 29, having mastered Mandarin, he was saving Richard Nixon, whom he regarded as "totally lacking in personal grace, with no sense of the proper distance to keep in human relations," from embarrassment with Zhou En-Lai on the famous trip to China. Twenty years later, as an Arabic speaker, he was interpreting George H.W. Bush—a fellow Yaleman and blueblood who fixed his name forever as "Chas"—to King Fahd as ambassador to Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War. Freeman is a throwback. He celebrates his Puritan roots and the idea of wide historical reading for its own sake. He is also completely dedicated. He lost his third son in India because of poor medical treatment. He lost a 30-year marriage in Saudi Arabia during the long hours of the Gulf War.
... Read More @ http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22249.htm
19 March 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
There are some basic concepts inherent in the training of the Time Knighthood...
Time travel into the future is inevitable...
Time travel is a variable. Variable depending on your movement.
Time control exist by virtue of our choice of movement.
Time travel backwards is a function of such displacements.
Time, all time, exists in the state of perpetual present.
Time and Space IS one. Where I am is when.
Time, Space, Thought: All IS one.
I think, therefore I am somewhen.
The I that I am cannot be in two places and be as I am, but younger or older can.
To Be Continued...
16 March 2009 in Knights Of Infinity | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Change? What Change?
Stimulus Package Tax Credit Should Mean $8 To $10 A Week
A little goes a long way, some experts say of the projected increase in take-home pay, but critics say individual taxpayers aren't getting a big enough break.
By James Oliphant
February 19, 2009 "Los Angeles Times" -- Reporting from Washington - President Obama signed the $787-billion stimulus package into law Tuesday while in Denver, his first major legislative victory and the final stroke in a six-week effort to jump-start the nation's struggling economy. Both houses of Congress passed the bill last week despite little Republican support.
Here are answers to some basic questions about the mammoth bill -- one of the biggest in U.S. history -- and how it could affect you and your family:
How soon will I benefit from this?
If you are unemployed and have not already received an extension on your benefits, the package provides up to 33 weeks of extended benefits to those who have exhausted their regular 26 weeks, depending on an individual state's jobless rate.Food stamp benefits will rise 13%.
Recipients of Social Security, Supplemental Security Income, railroad retirement benefits and veterans disability compensation or pension benefits will receive a one-time payment of $250.
What happens to my healthcare if I lose my job?
Healthcare coverage after you lose your job can typically be extended through COBRA. Under the stimulus bill, the government will cover 65% of the total cost of your health insurance premiums for a total of nine months, if you lose or have lost your job between Sept. 1, 2008, and the end of this year. If eligible, you should only be responsible for paying 35% of your total premium.
What benefits will I see if I am working?
You'll receive a $400 tax credit if you make less than $75,000, or an $800 credit for couples making less than $150,000 a year; it is slowly phased out if you make more than that. You should soon notice a change in your paycheck withholding, giving you an additional $8 to $10 a week.
Eight to 10 dollars a week? How is that supposed to stimulate the economy?
Experts say a little goes a long way. Maybe you help keep a restaurant open by eating out when you otherwise wouldn't. Or perhaps you buy a pair of shoes you otherwise wouldn't (albeit not Manolo Blahniks).
The bottom line, proponents say, is that money will flow into the economy that wouldn't have before. Critics say the tax credit frees up too little cash for individual taxpayers.
Why am I not getting a check directly from the IRS, like last year?
Because most people didn't spend that money. They saved it -- which did little to boost the economy. The White House and congressional Democrats said they did not want to repeat Bush administration economic policies.
Is there anything in this bill to help keep my house from foreclosure?
Other than perhaps a little more money in your pocket, no. But foreclosure is expected to be the subject of the White House's next initiative, to be announced today.
I keep hearing about the stimulus and the bailout. What's the difference?
The stimulus is a package of spending initiatives; investments in infrastructure, energy production and education; and tax cuts -- all designed to create jobs and leave people with (slightly) more money. The bailout, which was once called TARP and is now labeled the Financial Stability Plan, is a program through which the government is attempting to keep banks and other financial institutions stable by lending them capital and by helping to eliminate bad debts resulting from the collapse of the housing market. The goal there is to make credit more available for individuals and small businesses.
How many jobs will this package create?
The White House estimates 3.5 million jobs will be created or saved in the next two years as a result of the bill. It has estimated these jobs on a state-by-state basis, including 396,000 in California. The jobs will come through a combination of new construction projects, business savings, and investments in energy and education.
How will I be able to tell if this package is working?
Many experts say you might first notice when the economic news does not keep getting worse. After that, key indicators to watch are: fewer announcements of major job cuts by large companies; increasing consumer spending and confidence; more stable (and perhaps increasing) home prices; and a less frenetic stock market. But some economists have warned that the size of the package is simply too small to dramatically affect the United States' $14.2-trillion economy.
Where can I find more information?
The White House has set up a website: www.recovery.gov . You can read the bill in full and find breakdowns in spending, tax cuts and infrastructure investment as well as the state-by-state projects for job creation.
joliphant@tribune.com
24 February 2009 in Economics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Iran and the West: A History of Violence
By Eric Margolis
February 19, 2009 "Lew Rockwell" -- Iran is celebrating the 30th anniversary of its historic Islamic revolution after three decades of siege warfare by the western powers. To understand why relations between Tehran and the West are so bitter, we must understand their historical context.
Iran’s jagged relations with the West began during World War II. In 1941, the British Empire and Soviet Union jointly invaded and occupied the independent kingdom of Persia, as it was then known. This oil-motivated aggression was every bit as criminal as the German-Soviet occupation of Poland in 1939, but has been blanked out of western history texts.
The Allies deposed Iran’s ruler, Reza Shah, and installed his weak, pliant son, Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, on the throne as the latest puppet ruler in the British Empire.
But in 1951, a highly popular Iranian democratic leader, Mohammed Mossadegh, became prime minister and promptly nationalized Iran’s British-owned oil industry, ordering its profits be used to lift Iran from poverty rather than enriching Britain. The Shah and his entourage of western advisors fled.
Two years later, US and British intelligence mounted a coup that overthrew Mossadegh, ending Iran’s first democratic government. The Shah was restored to the Peacock Throne. Iran’s oil wealth returned to British and, now, US control. Washington and London proclaimed they had won an important victory against "Communism."
Washington and London set about turning Shah Pahlavi into the "gendarme of the Gulf" to protect their oil interests. The Shah quickly blossomed into a megalomaniac, styling himself the "Shah of Shahs," and "Imperial Light of the Aryans" (Iranians are an ancient Indo-European people), comparing himself to the ancient Persian emperors, Darius and Xerxes.
The Shah’s relatives and Iran’s tiny ruling, western-oriented elite looted the nation, living like pre-Revolution Russian royalty. Wives of the elite flew to Paris to have their hair done for gala parties. The nation’s oil revenues went to buy large amounts of US and British arms and build gaudy palaces. The rest of Iran remained mired in abject poverty as the nouveau riche royal court flaunted its wealth.
Iran’s elite put on European airs and dismissed Islam as a backwards faith of superstitious peasants. In this sense, they much resembled today’s so-called "secular" Turks who bitterly oppose Islam.
Iranians who objected to the court’s lurid ostentation, Iran’s status as a Western puppet, or the looting of its oil wealth, were branded Communists or Islamic fanatics.
Savak, the vastly powerful security agency, imposed a reign of terror on Iran. American and Israeli experts advised and taught Savak. Real and imagined opponents of the Shah, the Shia clergy, and leftists all fell victim to Savak, whose tortures and brutalities were legendary, even by brutal Mideast standards.
Iran and Israel, both hostile to their Arab neighbors, became very close allies, to the fury of deeply religious Iranians and the Shia clergy, which strongly supported the Palestinians. The Shah even negotiated to buy Israeli missiles with nuclear warheads in exchange for a steady supply of oil. Washington offered to sell Iran 26 nuclear reactors.
By the late 1970’s, the Shah’s imperial pretensions, the arrant corruption of his corrupt family, and the elite’s scorning of Islam brought Iran to a boil. In 1979, an exiled Shia religious leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeni, returned from exile in France and led a popular revolution that quickly overthrew the hated Shah. The US was caught flat-footed by Iran’s revolution. It had relied entirely on Savak for political information.
Popular fury quickly turned against the Shah’s primary supporter, the US. Mobs stormed the US embassy, taking hostages and bringing the two nations close to war. The shredded CIA documents patiently pieced together by Iranian women showed the amazing extent of the CIA’s influence over Iran. All the CIA’s networks were rolled up.
Ayatollah Khomeini proclaimed his nation’s oil wealth would be devoted to social programs. He called on the US-backed Arab oil states to follow the Koran’s teachings and share their wealth with poor Muslims everywhere. He called for the overthrow of other Mideast rulers, whom he damned as illegitimate apostates and western puppets.
Washington and London immediately began planning the overthrow of Iran’s new revolutionary Islamic government which directly threatened the Anglo-American domination of the Mideast – what I call in my new book, American Raj. The CIA sought to mount a number of military coups. Forty percent of Iran’s government leaders were assassinated by the Marxist "People’s Mujahidin."
In 1980, when these efforts failed to overthrow the Islamic regime, the US, Britain and their Arab oil clients got another US "gendarme" – Iraq’s Saddam Hussein – to invade Iran.
The resulting bloody, eight year Iran-Iraq war cost Iran one million casualties, half of them dead. Iran suffered more dead in this war than the US did in World War II. So violent and desperate was the World War I–style trench fighting that 12-year old Iranian boys and old men went forward to clear Iraqi minefields with their bodies.
The US, Britain, and the oil Arabs financed and helped arm Iraq. Israel sold Iraq a reported $5 billion in US arms and spare parts. Europe supplied Iraq with chemical weapons, food and arms.
After the US Navy entered the war on Iraq’s side, Iran was forced to sue for peace. Iran lay in financial and emotional ruins, with an entire generation killed in battle or horribly maimed by Iraq’s western-supplied chemical weapons that included the burning agents mustard gas and Lewisite, chlorine, cyanide, and a variety of modern nerve gases.
Rightly or wrongly, most Iranians blame the West for their historical suffering. They see the Western powers and Israel continuing efforts to overthrow their government, isolate Iran, and seize its oil. Or even launch a long-awaited air blitz against Iran’s so-far civilian nuclear program.
A former commander in the Iran-Iraq War, Mohammed Ahmadinejad, who led many dangerous missions behind Iraqi lines, is today the president of Iran. While Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei retains the nation’s real executive power, the bombastic, anti-Western Ahmadinejad speaks for much of Iran’s people.
President Barack Obama, who says he wants to open serious talks with Iran and establish better relations, will have his work cut out for him.
Eric Margolis [send him mail], contributing foreign editor for Sun National Media Canada. He is the author of War at the Top of the World and the new book, American Raj: Liberation or Domination?: Resolving the Conflict Between the West and the Muslim World. See his website.
24 February 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
30 January 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
30 January 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
LIVING IN THE QUESTION with Maureen Waddell
ONLY THE BEGINNING
As we glimpse what I fervently hope will be the last of former-president, George W. Bush. As you see, I have not grown enough to meet our new president, Barack H. Obama, even halfway on this one. But this shall come as I declare at this moment that I shall in future grant Bush, # 43, a bit more than the due respect requested, even required of a citizen. Just as long as his back is receding in the distance as I thus declare. ...
Beginning with the private luncheon, following the swearing-in of President Obama, in the Capitol building's Statuary Hall and further commencing with the parade and the procession to the White House in our great capital city of Washington, D.C., we can ALL celebrate now!! Tonight we shall celebrate with President Obama and Vice-President Biden and their families, friends and colleagues as we attend the Inaugural Balls taking place this evening - even if we only attend through our televisions and/or computer screens. In our home this evening we will be having just a little private party in commemoration of this great day.
Tomorrow our work truly begins as we all heed President Obama's call to service along with him. Tomorrow, as we answer with the ingenious, even unprecedented, actions our country has demonstrated from its inception, let us all remember that call, the 'fierce urgency of now' as Obama begins his own efforts to retrieve our country's honor, its unity - and its fiscal health - from the ignominy into which it has fallen in the eyes of the world in recent years.
Hail to our new Chief, indeed!! And Kudos to ALL Americans on this wonderfully glorious day!! Tomorrow we shall begin anew. Right after we celebrate today. We are Americans after all. What did you expect?
Maureen F. Waddell
January 20, 2009
Maureen may be reached at freelancenewsreport@juno.com
21 January 2009 in JRBlog Correspondent | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
LIVING IN THE QUESTION with Maureen Waddell
And Just Who Will We 'Be' Inauguration Day as We Listen to 'the Speech?'
And why is that important? Only because the answer to that question might help us to fulfill our part of the bargain between the governed and the government of the United States embodied in our new President, Barack H. Obama as he attempts once more to tell us who he is and what he values. Not just for himself, no, for you also, as partners with him in our common pact, this nation, and what it embodies. What will we hear, see, observe, think, and comment upon to friends and neighbors either then or later? Will we be attempting to apprehend who Obama is, just what he is conveying to us, individually and collectively or listening and seeing through an ideological perspective, a lens, if you will, a prism which colors all of our perceptions so that we end up comforted by our own preconceived ideas and subverting the change he calls for and represents in the process? Or will we be resonating to the true communication he also embodies?
That true communication involves some things more than others, of course. It involves assessing the authentic being of the man speaking to us. In this case it should be fairly easy to determine the truth of this process as he speaks. He will be speaking from a ground of values which he has represented throughout his life. Among them are the truths which he has grown into as he has grown in years and wisdom: awareness, integrity, intelligence, responsibility, inclusiveness and an integration of those values within his personality. From this perspective he looks outward upon our divided and divisive natures - and nation - and sees the possibility of unity once more. As he once said, and has repeated countless times, and as I paraphrase here: There are no white-Americans, no black-Americans; there are no Asian-Americans no Muslim-Americans, Latino- or Indian Americans. There are simply Americans. There are no red states and no blue states, simply the United States of America. And those values for which it stands was implicit in the forgoing. I suspect they were in his mind as he spoke. I know they were in his heart. As they are in mine and have been since my childhood. Although I, too, had to grow to meet them and him halfway. Thus the purpose of my life as I approach my own 'final chapter.'
As an older white female, born during WWII, I have lived through an era in which men of mixed race, as Obama is, were discounted and worse. He is half African-American; I lived though the days when that fact alone was a form of condemnation, when even the laws of the land did not fully extend to such a large part of our population. That we are only now inaugurating a president who carries within him the white AND the black should be reason enough to accept what I am reporting. The pain of that condemnation was intense to me as a sensitive child who knew and loved others of his lineage as friends and neighbors. I could not understand; I refused to accept the results, nay, the consequences, I perceived. That this day has finally arrived thrills me beyond what my words alone could ever convey.
So everyone seems to be talking and writing about what Obama's speech on Inauguration Day(!) is to contain figuring that they, thus, can take the 'measure of the man' in that way. This appears, from all I have heard and read, to be especially important for those who did not vote for him, for the Independents and/or Republicans, many of whom never bothered to determine who Obama was and what he had to offer when they had the responsibility to do so, that is before voting in November! Don't forget the renegade Democrats either or those who found it convenient to stay at home that day and not vote at all.
My intention is to have you approach this issue from the opposite perspective or both. Who are you? And, then, who is Obama? That task requires an awareness of your own perspective, your own process in assessing him; in short it requires a knowledge of the components of your perception as well as his.
Yes, words matter. But not only his.
Yours too. The words you will use in thinking of this day, this speech, the words you will use in talking with others about your experience, again in short, what you perceive in determining who Obama is and what he intends for all of us collectively, how these intentions will translate into policy, affect you and your family, your work, your life lived as an American citizen - all are important. You might then ask yourself:
What is my ideology?
What are my assumptions therefore?
How aware am I of the subtext (things seen, heard, assessed and filed often without full awareness?); once aware of the things expressed and not expressed, how aware am I of the context, the body language noted, both his and mine?
Am I sensitive to others? And, if so, on what basis?
Am I aware of self, of others, of community, of cultures and subcultures within our country, not simply my own? To which do I belong? To which do I long to be a member?
Are my relationships transactional or intrinsic?
Am I being completely honest with myself and others as I look at these issues?
What then might be my expectations of this man, this new president?
To what end? What do I really value, indeed?
Am I inspired? That is, am I 'in spirit?' (This last need not pertain to any religious affiliation whatsoever, but simply be spiritual and thus not man-made or derived from anything other than being created thoughtfully human)
For today, especially, the title of this column is perfect. At the outset of any new administration that is the position all of us are in, acknowledged or not, politically and ideologically supportive or not. We each, individually, bear the ultimate responsibility for the choice we have made collectively. So we must all henceforth be "living in the question." Of what his intentions and ultimately our own might be. Just keep questioning, especially ourselves.
In this instance, I actually supported our soon-to-be-President Obama and have high hopes on this day that he will achieve his primary objective: unity within our own country. And this, while Obama is fully aware that the primary threat to this country comes not from without, as has been commonly believed, but from within. Suicide is as much a tragedy when it is a country and its people as victims as when it is any individual. More so, in reality, as individual lives take place within the context of the whole. Obama, as a mature thinker, is aware of this wisdom. And awareness is all inclusive of the other, again commonly assumed, virtues.
It must be that I, too, value unity as this was literally the first thing which struck me about Obama back 14 years ago when I thought (prematurely) that he was going to be a writer, another value I hold as a reader and a rare book lover. In that respect I have always loved 'discovering' new first-time authors; thus my introduction to Obama through his wonderfully-written book, Dreams From My Father, which I still, and maybe now, pointedly, recommend to the other readers I know and love. That he became a politician as well, and therefore became available to our country as a whole, also thrills me as I do understand the struggles he has endured and the consistency of values which he has to offer to the rest of the American public - and, if I may still be so bold, to the world at large. And to acquit myself in these terms I shall be forced to quote myself from a column I wrote just about a year ago only days after the Iowa caucuses and then published in this space:
Many have spoken of his preternatural calm. Some have misinterpreted it, through their own distorted lens, as coldness. It is not. It is simply a reflection of that wisdom which he possesses within himself. At some level he already knows his purpose here is to bring us this gift of wisdom, to teach all of us of the truth of unity, both political and personal. He is running for President in order to to teach us, this fractured country of individuals, and other nations as well, of this unity. As I view it, he is God's wisdom made manifest within our world.
This wisdom is his to give only because he was willing to listen, to reflect, to learn and then to incorporate this wisdom into a higher level of responsibility and action. If we are able to heed this, the red state/blue state dichotomy, so cruelly present in our country, will cease to exist at a practical, political level. We will again be one people, united in our founding principles, and thus will be once more a "shining city on a hill" for the world to see, to emulate. For this possibility, this gift alone, I am profoundly grateful. And I am humbled even further by the depth of that gratitude.
Whatever controversy I engender, whatever rebuke my words evoke in others, pale into insignificance when confronted with truth. This, too, is a gift to share. I thank God for Barack Obama, for the signpost he is, and the truth he represents toward wisdom for us all. It is that wisdom, without which, at this level or of this quality, love itself cannot exist except as an unattainable ideal or an absolute. (Barack Obama: Again and Still, January 2008)
Now how many columnists get to quote themselves after all? Now that all of the above has come to pass, so to say, and thanks to our dear soon-to-be-President Obama, I just did. And for that, too, I am profoundly grateful.
It is a marvel to me that Barack Obama's Inauguration Day places him directly following Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday and just before Abraham Lincoln's! But to quote just MLK on this day I offer this thought of his:
All this is simply to say that all life is interrelated. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality; tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. As long as there is poverty in this world, no man can be totally rich even if he has a billion dollars. As long as diseases are rampant and millions of people cannot expect to live more than twenty or thirty years, no man can be totally healthy, even if he just got a clean bill of health from the finest clinic in America. Strangely enough, I can never be what I ought to be until you are what you ought to be. You can never be what you ought to be until I am what I ought to be. This is the way the world is made." (Martin Luther King, Jr. 6-6-6/Lincoln University in his commencement speech entitled 'The American Dream')
From 'I have a dream' to 'yes, we can!' What a country! And perhaps not so surprising after all that today we are ALL Americans. For this latter, I am, perhaps, most grateful of all.
Maureen F. Waddell
January 20, 2009
Marueen may be reached at freelancenewsreport@juno.com
21 January 2009 in JRBlog Correspondent | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
"Limbs And Meat" In The Street
10 January 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Because for the next 10 days they can get away with it without fear of reprisal from the U. S.
Russia invaded South Ossetia. However, South Ossetia attacked Russia. Russia settled it, and while leaving followed the first rule of engagement to not leave an enemy sronghold intact. It did not continue to waste civilians. Israel is now involved in blitzkrieg with Palestine and yet supporters feel it is unfair to compare the IDF with the Nazis that invaded Poland. And as much of the world looks on, so was it then.
Israel knows that U. S. foreign policy is about to shift from that of bowing to the lobbyist after the inauguration. And while may may try to defend the current actions taken, Israel has to realize it can't have it both ways. The U. N. was wong to adopt the position that zionism is not a form of racism. Not all of Israel buy into it. And, with a nuclear arsenal, no small wonder Iran htakes issue. In a recent BBC interiew a journalist recapped how Israel originally funded Hamas as a force against Palestine. The Mosque recently bombed for "hiding" artillery was also funded by Israel. Interestingly, international journalist have started refraining from use of the word "terrorist." The fire for the witch hunt has been disdained. The press has wised up. The weighted news we receive in the states is so slanted, we cannot buy into the sympathy cries nor the Bush selective endorsement that a country has a right to defend itself.
10 January 2009 in Current Affairs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
A reader submits... For Your Review
http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/usaopress/2008/txdv08_2008-11-12_phendrickson.pdf
U.S. Department of Justice
Terrence Berg United States Attorney Eastern District of Michigan
Suite 2001 211 West Fort Street Detroit, Michigan 48226-3277
For Immediate Release: Contact: Gina Balaya (313) 226-9758
Nov 12, 2008
EVENT: Indictment Defendant: Peter Hendrickson
Man Indicted for Submitting False Documents With the Internal Revenue Service
Peter Hendrickson, 53, was arraigned today in federal court in Detroit on an indictment charging him with submitting several false documents with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Acting United States Attorney Terrence Berg announced today.
The 10-count indictment charges that for the calendar years 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 Hendrickson filed IRS Forms 1040 (income tax returns) and/or IRS Forms 4852 (Substitute for Form W-2) stating under penalties of perjury that he had received no wages in those years. The indictment indicates that he had in fact received wages in those years in varying amounts.
In May 2007, a federal court in Detroit permanently enjoined Peter Hendrickson from filing tax returns and forms on which he falsely reported his income as zero. The injunction order, signed by U.S. District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds, also required Hendrickson and his wife to repay more than $20,000 in federal income, Social Security and Medicare taxes that they had obtained by filing false tax returns with the IRS.
According to information in the May 2007 court order, Hendrickson based his improper conduct on a book he wrote called "Cracking the Code." The book states that federal tax withholding and income taxes on wages are applicable only for a limited class of people, primarily government employees. The court found that position to be "false and frivolous," and cited an earlier court decision holding the position to be "preposterous."
Peter Hendrickson was convicted in 1992 on federal criminal charges for failing to file a federal income tax return and for a conspiracy involving a firebomb placed in a bin at a U.S. Post Office in Royal Oak, Mich. on April 16, 1990, the last day on which tax returns could be postmarked that year.
Acting United States Attorney Berg said, "The right to protest cannot cross the line into unlawful conduct. Although our system depends on the voluntary compliance of citizens, no one is exempt from paying taxes or following federal tax laws."
"This is yet another example of the Justice Department's commitment, under the National Tax Defier Initiative, to use off all of its tools - both civil and criminal - to stop tax defier conduct throughout the nation," said Nathan J. Hochman, Assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department's Tax Division. "Hendrickson, if convicted, faces years in prison, steep fines, and paying back all taxes with penalties and interest."
"The Internal Revenue Code has no hidden secrets and applies to all taxpayers," said Eileen Mayer, Chief, Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation Division. "Today's indictment signals the IRS' determination to ensure that all taxpayers abide by the tax laws and pay their fair share of taxes."
An indictment is only a charge and is not evidence of guilt. A defendant is entitled to a fair trial in which it will be the government's burden to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The case was investigated by special agents of the IRS. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Leibson and Department of Justice Tax Division attorney Mark Daly.
More information about the Justice Department's efforts to stop tax fraud promoters and preparers through civil and criminal actions is available on the Tax Division's website.
Pete Hendrickson responds to most recent DOJ attack on him and his book Cracking the Code.
Pete's Comments……
They're Gluttons For Punishment...
Six years or so ago, some IRS flunky made the mistake of his or her career in refusing to accept the return filed by my wife and me, leading to my uncovering the liberating truth about the income tax. A year later, some higher-level IRS stooge did it again, taking me into court with allegations of "promoting an abusive tax shelter" by way of CtC, and promptly losing three quick cases and killing that issue permanently.
Two years after that, a still-higher-level thug pushed the agency and the DoJ to try to slow the spread of the truth about the tax by filing a "lawsuit" against my wife and me, in which the federal courts are asked to order us to testify to the government's specifications in order to create a pretense under which we could be held liable for taxes which even the Treasury Department's own internal records admit that we don't owe. This has proven to be a sustained, still-ongoing embarrassment to the agency, the DoJ, and the courts (and yet another definitive affirmation of the accuracy of what is revealed in CtC).
Now, as I got word on Wednesday, another batch of these folks is daring another, and more significant, embarrassment, by charging me with allegedly having "Willfully [made] and [subscribed] any return, statement, or other document, which contains or is verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury, and which he does not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter." (The details can be seen here.)
I look forward with great interest to the government's attempts to carry its burden of proving that I'm wrong about the law, and what's more, that I don't (and didn't) believe what I said in my filings to be true and correct as to every material matter...
The realities of both fact and law that are involved here mean that competent management of this trial will result in a just outcome, and a really serious bloody nose for a couple of agencies whose efforts the evade the law are increasingly desperate, and erratic.
That kind of management requires some specialized skills, though, and getting them will cost a lot of money. I hope all of you will participate. Donations for that purpose can be made here, or by mail to Pete Hendrickson, 232 Oriole Rd., Commerce Twp., MI 48382.
**
P. S. If you see posts about this subject in newsgroups, forums, etc., please do me the favor of posting my comments above in response (with links active), or, better still, post, "Pete has posted comments about this latest attack on the truth about the tax-- along with some important links-- at www.losthorizons.com/Newsletter.htm#IRSAttack".
31 December 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Download Wes Culver and the WWII German Super Cannon
Click On The File Above To Listen To The Interview
Interview by J. R. Fellabaum at the Lehigh Florida VFW
This is the war story of Wes Culver, who is a part-time Lehigh Florida resident and part-time Erie PA summer resident. Wes was in th armored corp. The dreaded German Super Cannon that could lob a shell to London was run on railroad tracks and pulled out of train tunnels to shoot. Wes was at an armored servicing center when they were the missed target of an attack from this cannon. Wes tells his story. Afterwards, I let the tape run. I shared a little and as the tape ran Wes got to a portion of the story that probably has not been told asoften and hence the rest of his story...
17 December 2008 in You Too Interviews | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
It seems there may a loophole in the law that works to the advantage of consumers.
Big Problem: According to a recent NPR news story, most people do notshow up for their foreclosure hearings. Pehhaps they feel that since they can't pay they are doomed. In an interview with Marc Shapiro, an attorney in Naples Florida doing foreclosure defense, not showing up or having representation cmay cost your more.
-Promissory Note: An agreement to pay. Signed by the borrower only.
-Mortgage: A lien against the leveraged property. Signed by both spouses in Florida.
At foreclosure, additional fees may be apportioned to both spouses, even if only one signed the note. Being there means you can object to the additional fees and perhaps the judge will waive them. Also, the judge may even temporarily stay the execution of the foreclosure. According to Mr. Shapiro, "Every one falls on hard times. Even judges know this". Don't miss your day in court.
For those Do-It-Your-Selfers... read on:
Legallyeliminatreforeclosuretoday.com offers a ready to use form. The use of the form is when you receive a foreclosure notice and the legal papers say such verbage as "original bloan note lost and a certified copy is being used." According to Fllorida law and some appeals courts, the "original note signed in blue ink" must accompany the foreclosure. Afterall, with all the forms you sign at a closing, who's to say the one they are representing as your loan contains original terms. The pages should be initialed in blue ink as well. There is so much mortgage fraud and HUD 1 forms are now the tip of the iceberg, who's to say that's the note you signed? Fight, you got everything to gain and nothing more to lose.
10 December 2008 in Economics, Ethics/Law/Legal Field/Insurance Industry | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
My wife sat down on the couch next to me as I was flipping channels. She asked, 'What's on TV?'
I said, 'Dust.'
And then the fight started...
=============================
My wife was hinting about what she wanted for our upcoming anniversary.
She said, 'I want something shiny that goes from 0 to 150 in about 3 seconds.'
I bought her a scale.
And then the fight started...
==============================
When I got home last night, my wife demanded that I take her someplace expensive... so, I took her to a gas station...
And then the fight started....
==============================
After retiring, I went to the Social Security office to apply for Social Security. The woman behind the counter asked me for my driver's license to verify my age. I looked in my pockets and realized I had left my wallet at home. I told the woman that I was very sorry, but I would have to go home and come back later.
The woman said, 'Unbutton your shirt'. So I opened my shirt revealing my curly silver hair. She said, 'That silver hair on your chest is proof enough for me' and she processed my Social Security application.
When I got home, I excitedly told my wife about my experience at the Social Security office.
She said, 'you should have dropped your pants. You might have gotten disability, too.'
And then the fight started...
==============================
My wife and I were sitting at a table at my high school reunion, and I kept staring at a drunken lady swigging her drink as she sat alone at a nearby table.
My wife asked, 'Do you know her?' 'Yes,' I sighed, she's my old girlfriend. I un derstand she took to drinking right after we split up those many years ago, and I hear she hasn't been sober since.'
'My God!' says my wife, 'who would think a person could go on celebrating that long?'
And then the fight started...
==============================
I rear-ended a car this morning. So, there we were alongside the road and slowly the other driver got out of his car. You know how sometimes you just get soooo stressed and little things just seem funny? Yea h, well I couldn't believe it.... he was a DWARF!!!
He stormed over to my car, looked up at me, and shouted, 'I AM NOT HAPPY!'
So, I looked down at him and said, 'Well, then which one are you?'
And then the fight started...
10 December 2008 in Humor | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
By admin on Dec 2, 2008
It is becoming painfully obvious that we may very well have a criminal President in 2009. No this isn’t a joke. What I speak of is the curious developments in the supposedly racist, biased, dumb, as well as insane case of where Obama was born. Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate
A strange development indeed is how it is that every time Barack Obama or a family member tells of where Obama was born, they seem to have no idea as of December 2008.
They seemed to know what hospital quite a few times months ago when it was claimed that Obama’s mother gave birth to him at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu - Obama and Mom Never Here
The Queen’s Medical Center
1301 Punchbowl StreetHonolulu, HI 96813 Link to Site
Phone number 808-538-9011 General Medical Records 808-547-4361.
After it was concluded that Obama and his mother were never there, his sister was in an interview (Mary) and claimed that Obama was born at Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children - Obama and Mom Never Here 1319 Punahou StreetHonolulu, Hawaii 96826(808) 535-7000 Link to site
Hospital after hospital in Honolulu all have NO RECORD of Obama or mother ever being there. Is this some state secret? Are we to believe that even the hospital that he was born in should remain secret? Why lie to us as if it matters I mean the man did win the Presidential vote? Why the lies and secrecy?
We already know that Obama’s family and the entire nation of Kenya (which is about to have a national holiday for Obama) know that Barack Obama was born in Mombasa Coastal Hospital in Kenya. The government of Kenya has sealed these records. More and more secrecy due to the fact that once proven, Obama will not be constitutionally allowed to become President of the United States!
Hospitals you can check yourself
We were pretty detailed in our calls. You can look at every hospital here and call any of them. You can file freedom of information acts, you can do everything and anything you wish. Barack Obama was never born in a hospital in Hawaii as claimed.
Only his original that he has sealed will have this info. Will the Supreme Court force it open and thus preserve the Constitution of the United States?
A. From Hawaii’s official Department of Health, Vital Records webpage: “Amended certificates of birth may be prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law, for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign country“ (applies to adopted children).
B. A parent may register an in-state birth in lieu of certification by a hospital of birth under HRS 338-5.
C. Hawaiian law expressly provides for registration of out-of-state births under HRS 338-17.8. A foreign birth presumably would have been recorded by the American consular of the country of birth, and presumably that would be reflected on the Hawaiian birth certificate.
D. Hawaiian law, however, expressly acknowledges that its system is subject to error. See, for example, HRS 338-17.
E. Hawaiian law expressly provides for verification in lieu of certified copy of a birth certificate under HRS 338-14.3.
F. Even the Hawaii Department of Home Lands does not accept a certified copy of a birth certificate as conclusive evidence for its homestead program. From its web site: “In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”
Now that we all understand that you can be born in Madagascar, Russia, Norway, Brazil or even Kenya like Obama and still have a REAL birth certificate that both Snopes and Factcheck would say was real since they are real. That doesn’t mean you were born in Hawaii. Does this matter to America?
Barack Obama has as of November 27th 2008 spent over$500,000 U.S. to prevent others from seeing it. Why? Didn’t he already win the vote?
Please don’t bring up Snopes (link) that says THEYVE SEEN Obama’s birth certificate and it is the one on his site called Fight the Smears. That is just plain garbage as it has a 2007 border and doesn’t list the hospital, Dr. or place of birth! Plus they say they’ve seen his real birth certificate (you know the one that we the people aren’t allowed to see) .
All of the people born in Korea, Kenya, Mongolia, Australia and who also have Hawaiian birth certificates also have REAL birth certificates.
This does not mean they were born in Hawaii. Get it?
The following is what Obama has on his site as his real birth certificate authenticated by Snopes and Factcheck. Hmmm - 2007 borders, no info on original at all? What’s wrong with this picture? Yes it is a real birth certificate, so are the tens of thousands of other birth certificates given to people born in other countries.
Please don’t bring up Fact Check either (link) as they and Snopes can literally LOOK AT the thousands and thousands of birth certificates in Hawaii from people born in Korea, Australia, Germany and even Kenya like Barack Obama! They are all REAL and Authentic birth certificates, but that doesn’t mean Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.
Snopes and FactCheck aren’t lying when they say the 2007 birth certificate on Obama’s site is real. So are the thousands and thousands of birth certificates in Hawaii from people born in Korea, Australia, Germany and even Kenya like Barack Obama! They are all REAL and Authentic birth certificates, but that doesn’t mean they or Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.
This is the whole point my friends. That is why many of us are incensed that Obama is about to become the President and may not even Constitutionally qualify to be one!
This is unacceptable to every American who understands that Hawaii issues birth certificates to those born in foreign nations.
Yes - it is a proven fact that Hawaii grants birth certificates to people born in other nations! If you or I want a copy, they produce the document that you see on Obama’s site. That is NOT the one that has what we need to see to have Obama become President of the United States.
03 December 2008 in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Several years ago I read an article on the misuse of U. S. drug fighting money and how Columbia was using it for social cleansing. That was around 1995. Here, 2008, is a related article.
DEA complicit in drug trade, says Morales
|
Agence France-Presse Morales says evidence will be presented to President Obama
|
26 November 2008 in State Of The World | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
26 November 2008 in State Of The World | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
26 November 2008 in Political Opinion | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
|
Hidden Histories Revealed: So much for the ‘Mother of Parliaments’ |
|
|
Back in June of 2006 I wrote a piece, based on a story in the New African magazine on how the British government fixed the Nigerian ‘independence’ elections, so that the winner would be a compliant servant of the British government and of course, British and US capital (see ‘Hidden Histories’ 24 June, 2006). The piece opened with the following quotation from the New African article, the only publication in the UK that had the courage to print the story about how the government fixed the Nigerian election. All the mainstream media caved into government pressure (no doubt a ‘D’ Notice was issued) to kill the story. This lone civil servant, Harold Smith, blew the lid on the fix and has paid the price for his honesty and courage literally for the rest of his life. This month New African magazine published a followup to their original piece following the publication by the British government of official papers that confirm Harold Smith’s allegations of election rigging, down to the letter. The documents that confirm Harold Smith’s original allegations are to be found in an extremely expensive (£500) set of documents published for the Institute of Commonwealth Studies at the University of London in 2000 and 2001. The series are titled ‘British Documents on the End of Empire Project’ (BDEEP) and it is in ‘Series A Volume 4’ that the relevant documents can be found, and as the author of the New African article Osei Boateng says, Boateng quotes some of the relevant information from the documents including, And under the subhead economic we read, But the kicker is to be found in the following quote taken from the minutes of a meeting held on 14 December 1959 involving R.S. Hudson, E.R. Hammer and Sir Hilton Poyton, who was then deputy under-secretary of state at the Colonial Office, And this is where the unfortunate Harold Smith came in. Smith, then 29 and with a promising career in the British civil service ahead of him, was selected by Sir James Robertson, the then governor-general of Nigeria, to oversee the 'fix', a fix that Smith refused to be a party to. In refusing and worse, in refusing to keep quiet about it in spite of bribes, including an offer of a knighthood and a lucrative (but overseas) position, Smith sealed his own fate. Now 81 and unemployed ever since, he at least has the satisfaction of seeing accusations confirmed by the official documents of the time. But perhaps the most revealing aspect of the entire, sordid affair is the one played by the British media in conniving with the state in suppressing the story. As was revealed in my previous story, the reaction of mainstream journalists (I use the term journalist advisedly) is worth reprinting here, Predictably, Mr Young resorted to smearing the indefatigable Mr Smith with the following dismissive note, Thus we read why the one of the alleged ‘experts’ on Africa, Alastair Hetherington, could not find space in his book The Guardian Years on the first and at the time most devastating calamities to befall Africa, the Biafran War, a war that came about as a direct result of the rigged elections of 1959-60, Omission due to space restrictions? Over two million people died in the Nigeria-Biafra War! Furthermore, it was probably the first war, at least on the African continent, to use a PR company to spread propaganda in the West, and propaganda that worked extremely effectively, convincing even those on the left that it should support Biafra’s independence (even though Biafra was supported with arms and logistics by the Apartheid government of South Africa and that of Portugal and of course Biafra was the location of the Niger Delta and all that oil). My original essay ended with the reference to yet another futile exchange between MediaLens and Ms Boaden of BBC News over the BBC's lack of coverage of the BRussell’s World Tribunal on Iraq:
This essay is archived at: http://www.creative-i.info/?p=2380 |
|
If you forward this email to anybody, they can subscribe by clicking here |
26 November 2008 in Newsfeed | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
With all the "Drill Baby Drill" commentary we've heard recently, perhaps we should re-evaluate our direction?
Here is one such consideration since Yucca mountain is being shoved down the throats of Nevadans and everyone that the stuff will be drven by to get it there.
Cautionary Tales From a Nuclear War Zone
By BARBARA ROSE JOHNSTON
and HOLLY M. BARKER
John Anjain, Alab of Rongelap, Marshall Islands:
November 23, 2008 "Counterpunch" -- - Early in the morning of March 1, 1954, sometime around five or six o'clock, American planes dropped a hydrogen bomb on Bikini Atoll. Shortly before this happened, I had awakened and stepped out of my house. Once outside, I looked around and saw Billiet Edmond making coffee near his house. I walked up and stood next to him. The two of us talked about going fishing later in the morning. After only a few minutes had passed we saw a light to the west of Rongelap Atoll. When this light reached Rongelap we saw many beautiful colors. I expect the reason people didn't go inside their houses right away was because the yellow, green, pink, red, and blue colors which they saw were such a beautiful sight before their eyes.
The second thing that happened involved the gust of wind that came from the explosion. The wind was so hot and strong that some people who were outside staggered, including Billiet and I. Even some windows fell as a result of the wind.
The third thing that happened concerned the smoke-cloud which we saw from the bomb blast. The smoke rose quickly to the clouds and as it reached them we heard a sound louder than thunder. When people heard this deafening clap some of the women and children fled to the woods. Once the sound of the explosion had died out everyone began cooking, some made donuts and others cooked rice.
Later some men went fishing, including myself. Around nine or ten-o'clock I took my throw net and left to go fishing near Jabwon. As I walked along the beach I looked at the sky and saw it was white like smoke; nevertheless I kept on going. When I reached Jabwon, or even a little before, I began to feel a fine powder falling all over my body and into my eyes. I felt it but I didn't know what it was.
I went ahead with my fishing and caught enough fish with my throw-net to fill a bag. Then I went to the woods to pick some coconuts. I came back to the beach and sat on a rock to drink the coconuts and eat some raw fish. As I was sitting and eating, the powder began to fall harder. I looked out and saw that the coconuts had changed color. By now all the trees were white as well as my entire body. I gazed up at the sky but couldn't see the clouds because it was so misty. I didn't believe this was dangerous. I only knew that powder was falling. I was somewhat afraid nevertheless.
When I returned to Rongelap village I saw people cooking food outside their cook-houses. They didn't know the powder was very dangerous. The powder fell all day and night long over the entire atoll of Rongelap. During the night people were sick. They were nauseous, they had stomach, head, ear, leg and shoulder aches. People did not sleep that night because they were sick.
The next day, March 2, 1954, people got up in the morning and went down to get water. It had turned a yellowish color. "Oh, Oh" they cried out and said "the powder that fell down yesterday and last night is a harmful thing." They were sick and so Jabwe, the health-aide, walked around in the morning and warned the people not to drink the water. He told them that if they were thirsty to drink coconuts only.
. . . At three o'clock in the afternoon of March 2, 1954 a seaplane from Enewetak Atoll landed in the lagoon of Rongelap and two men came ashore. Billiet and I asked them why they had come to Rongelap and they responded by saying they had come to inspect the damage caused by the bomb. They said they would spend twenty minutes looking at all the wells, cement water catchments, houses and other things. The two men returned quickly to their plane and left without telling anyone that the food, water, and other things were harmful to human beings.
Everyone was quite surprised at the speed with which the men surveyed everything in the island and then returned to their plane. People said maybe we've been really harmed because the men were in such a hurry to leave. Although they said they would look around for about twenty minutes, they probably didn't stay here for more than ten minutes. So in less than ten minutes after their arrival on Rongelap, the two men had already taken off.
. . . On that day we looked at the water catchments, tubs and other places where there was a great deal of water stored. The water had turned a strong yellow and those who drank it said it tasted bitter.
On March 3, early in the morning, a ship and a seaplane with four propellers appeared on Rongelap. Out of the plane came Mr. Oscar de[Brum] - and Mr. Wiles, the governor of Kwajelein Atoll. As their boat reached the shore, Mr. Oscar cried out to the people to get on board and forget about their personal belongings for whoever thought of staying behind would die. Such were the words by which he spoke to them. Therefore, none of the people went back to their houses, but immediately got on the boats and sailed to board the ship that would take them away. Those who were sick and old were evacuated by plane.
. . . At ten o'clock in the morning we left Rongelap for Ailinginae Atoll and arrived there at three in the afternoon. We picked up nineteen people on this atoll and by five o'clock we were on our way to Kwajalein.
On March 4, we arrived on Kwajalein and met the Admiral who then sent us to where we were to stay. A day later, Dr. Conard and his medical team arrived. The doctors were very thorough in checking and caring for our injuries and showed much concern in examining us. The Admiral was also very concerned about our situation and took us in as if we were his own children. His name was Admiral Clark.
Ever since 1954 Dr. Conard has continued to examine the fallout victims on a yearly basis. These visits are very important for all the people on Rongelap and others in the Marshall Islands. These medical examinations are also of great importance for men throughout the world.
. . . From 1959 to 1963 and 1964, after the Rongelapese had returned to Rongelap from Majuro, many women gave birth prematurely to babies which looked somewhat like animals. Women also had miscarriages. During these years many other strange things happened with regard to food, especially to fish in which the fertilized eggs and liver turned a blackish color. In all my forty years I had never seen this happen in fish either on Rongelap or in any of the other places I've been in the Marshall Islands. Also, when people ate fish or [arrowroot] starch produced on Rongelap, they developed a rash in their mouths. This too I had never seen before.
. . . I, John, Anjain, was magistrate of Rongelap when all this occurred and I now write this to explain what happened to the Rongelap people at that time.
[In 1954] the people of Rongelap stayed on Kwajalein for three months and the DOE [Atomic Energy Commission] people removed the Rongelap people to Majuro. The people lived in Majuro for three years and in 1956 the DOE, Trust Territory government and the UN came to Majuro and I went with them to attend a meeting with them at the school in Rita. And they told me that it is time that we go back home. And I asked "are we really going home while Rongelap is contaminated?" And the answer that they give me is that "it is true that Rongelap is contaminated but it is not dangerous. And if you don't believe us, well then stay here and take care of yourself."
. . . In 1957 the people returned to Rongelap and the DOE promised that there wouldn't be any problems to the Rongelap people. However in 1958 and 1959 most of the women gave birth to something that was not resembling human beings. There was a woman giving birth to a grape. Another woman gave birth to something that resembles a monkey. And so on. There was a child born at that time and there was no shell covering the top of that child's head.
The American doctors came every year to examine us. Every year they came, and they told us that we were not sick, and then they would return the next year. But they did find something wrong. They found one boy did not grow as fast as boys his age. They gave him medicine. Then they began finding the thyroid sickness.
My son Lekoj was thirteen when they found his thyroid was sick. They took him away to a hospital in America. They cut out his thyroid. They gave him some medicine and told him to take it every day for the rest of his life. The same thing happened to other people. The doctors kept returning and examining us. Several years ago, they took me to a hospital in America, and they cut out my thyroid. They gave me medicine and told me to take it every day for the rest of my life.
A few years after the bomb, Senator Amata Kabua tried to get some compensation for the people of Rongelap. He got a lawyer, and the lawyer made a case in court. The court turned our case down. The court said it could not consider our case because we were not part of the United States. Dwight Heine went to the United Nations to tell them about us. People from the United Nations came to see us, and we told them how we felt. Finally, in 1964, the U.S. Congress passed a bill. The bill gave us money as a payment for our experience. Some of the people spent all their money; some of them still have money in the bank. After we got the money, they began finding the thyroid sickness.
In 1972, they took Lekoj away again. They said they wanted to examine him. They took him to America to a big hospital near Washington. Later, they took me to this hospital near Washington because they said he was very sick. My son Lekoj died after [I] arrived. He never saw his island again. He returned home in a box. He is buried on our island. The doctors say he had a sickness called leukemia. They are quite sure it was from the bomb.
But I am positive.
I saw the ash fall on him. I know it was the bomb. I watched him die.
***
Statement of Almira Matayoshi to the Nuclear Claims Tribunal, Marshall Islands (2001):
I was pregnant when they dropped the bomb [Bravo]. I was flown off of Rongelap with the other pregnant women and elderly people. The rest of the people left on the boat. I gave birth to Robert on Ejit, and he was normal. The child I had after Robert, when we had returned to Rongelap, I gave birth to something that was like grapes. I felt like I was going to die from the loss of blood. My vision was gone, and I was fading in and out of consciousness. They emergency evacuated me to Kwajalein, and I was sure I was going to die. After the grapes, I had a third child. It wasn't like a child at all. It had no bones and was all skin. When I gave birth they said, "Ak ta men en?" [What is that thing?]. Mama said uror [a term denoting exacerbation]. It was the first strange child that people had seen. I was the first. That time was the worst in my life. I feel both angry and embarrassed.
***
What words can possibly communicate what it is like to see and survive such sights? To become increasingly fearful that the intense beauty of your world-the water, the sand, the plants, the soil, the sea, and all the creatures within-has been fundamentally transformed by invisible, untouchable, all-encompassing poison? After years and years of living in a radioactive laboratory as the subject of scrutiny and study, what does it mean to find your fears confirmed-that your favorite foods are taboo, that your loved ones grow old before their time and your children fail to thrive? What does it mean to "survive" downwind from the the United States proving grounds - where nuclear war was practiced and perfected by Cold War warriors?
In 1946, after evacuating the people of Bikini and nearby atoll communities in the Marshall Islands, the United States detonated two atomic weapons: the same type of bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki in 1945. In 1947 the United Nations designated the Marshall Islands a United States Trust Territory. Over the next eleven years, this U.S. territory played host to another sixty-five atmospheric atomic and thermonuclear tests. The largest of these tests, code named Bravo, was detonated on March 1, 1954. This 15-megaton hydrogen bomb was purposefully exploded close to the ground. It melted huge quantities of coral atoll, sucking it up and mixing it with radiation released by the weapon before depositing it on the islands and inhabitants in the form of ash, or radioactive fallout. The wind was blowing that morning in the direction of inhabited atolls, including Rongelap and Utrik, some 100 and 300 miles from the test site at Bikini. The Marshallese communities on Rongelap, Ailinginae, and Utrik atolls, U.S. servicemen on Rongerik Atoll (weathermen who were monitoring winds and fallout), and the twenty-three-man crew of the Japanese fishing vessel Fukuryu Maru (Lucky Dragon) received near-lethal doses of radiation from the Bravo event.
International protests and calls for a ban on nuclear weapons testing prompted the U.S. government to publicly acknowledge the incident and accept liability. The Marshallese filed an April 20, 1954, complaint to the United Nations Trusteeship Council:
We, the Marshallese people feel that we must follow the dictates of our consciences to bring forth this urgent plea to the United Nations, which has pledged itself to safeguard the life, liberty and the general well being of the people of the Trust Territory, of which the Marshallese people are a part.
. . . The Marshallese people are not only fearful of the danger to their persons from these deadly weapons in case of another miscalculation, but they are also very concerned for the increasing number of people who are being removed from their land.
. . . Land means a great deal to the Marshallese. It means more than just a place where you can plant your food crops and build your houses; or a place where you can bury your dead. It is the very life of the people. Take away their land and their spirits go also.
In response to this petition the United States assured the General Assembly of the United Nations:
The fact that anyone was injured by recent nuclear tests in the Pacific has caused the American people genuine and deep regret. . . . The United States Government considers the resulting petition of the Marshall Islanders to be both reasonable and helpful. . . . The Trusteeship Agreement of 1947 which covers the Marshall Islands was predicated upon the fact that the United Nations clearly approved these islands as a strategic area in which atomic tests had already been held. Hence, from the onset, it was clear that the right to close areas for security reasons anticipated closing them for atomic tests, and the United Nations was so notified; such tests were conducted in 1948, 1951, 1952 as well as in 1954. . . . The question is whether the United States authorities in charge have exercised due precaution in looking after the safety and welfare of the Islanders involved. That is the essence of their petition and it is entirely justified. In reply, it can be categorically stated that no stone will be left unturned to safeguard the present and future well-being of the Islanders.
The United States promised the Marshallese and the United Nations General Assembly that "Guarantees are given the Marshallese for fair and just compensation for losses of all sorts."
These guarantees worked: the United States was able to continue its atmospheric weapons testing program in the Marshall Islands through 1958 and at its Nevada test site through 1963, when the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union finally signed on to a limited test ban treaty.
The United States has not, however, fully lived up to its promises to the United Nations or the Marshallese people to safeguard their well-being. Atmospheric weapons testing in the Pacific resulted in considerable human and environmental harm.
Atmospheric nuclear weapons tests released numerous radioisotopes and dangerous heavy metals. An estimated 2 percent of the radioactive fallout was iodine-131, a highly radioactive isotope with an 8-day half-life. The nuclear war games conducted by the United States in the Marshall Islands released some 8 billion curies of iodine-131. To place this figure in broader context, over the entire history of nuclear weapons testing at the Nevada Proving Grounds, some 150 million curies of iodine-131 were released, and varying analyses of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster estimate an iodine-131 release of 40 to 54 million curies. Much of the iodine-131 released in the Marshall Islands was the by-product of the March 1, 1954, Bravo test detonation of the hydrogen bomb. Designed to produce and contain as much radioactive fallout in the immediate area as possible, in order to create laboratory-like conditions, Bravo unleashed as much explosive yield as one thousand Hiroshima-sized bombs. Communities living downwind from the blast, especially the Rongelap community, were acutely exposed to its fallout.
Evacuated three days after the blast, the people of Rongelap spent three months under intense medical scrutiny as human subjects in Project 4.1. They spent three years as refugees and were returned to their still-contaminated atoll in 1957 with assurances that their islands were now safe. They lived on Rongelap for another twenty-eight years and as the closest populated atoll to the Pacific Proving Grounds, they were exposed to additional fallout from another series of nuclear tests in 1958. While living on Rongelap, the community was visited annually, and later biannually, by U.S. government scientists and medical doctors conducting follow-up studies begun under Project 4.1. Researchers collected fish, plants, soil, and human body samples to document the presence of radioisotopes deposited from sixty-seven tests, the movement of these isotopes through the food chain and the human body, and the adverse health impact of this radiation on the human body.
The community left Rongelap in 1985 after receiving information from some U.S. scientists that confirmed their long-held fears that their ancestral homeland was contaminated with radiation at levels that posed a serious risk to their health. Today, the Rongelap community lives in exile, largely on borrowed or rented lands in Kwajalein and Majuro atolls. Recent efforts to remediate fallout hazards on areas of some islands and to rebuild homes and community structure on the island of Rongelap suggest that the community may, someday soon, have the choice of returning home. Whether or not remediation is successful and people decide to return remains to be seen�
The people of Rongelap are not the only nuclear nomads created by the actions of military and nuclear powers over the past six decades. They are, however, one of the most studied communities.
Following their acute exposure in 1954 the people of Rongelap enrolled in a medical research program sponsored by the Atomic Energy Commission. The program was designed to document the movement of radiation through the atmosphere, food chain, and human body, with the goal of understanding the long-term effects of human exposure to ionizing radiation.
Over the years, U.S. scientists added to the research program "control" subjects, including people on Rongelap who were not present during the Bravo test, people on the nearby atoll of Utrik, people on Likiep (another populated atoll in the northern Marshall Islands), and people on Majuro. Control subjects were typically selected to match the acutely exposed by age and sex, and scientists studied these people in many instances for four decades. Comparative studies documented increases in thyroid disorders, stunted growth in children, and increases in many forms of cancer and leukemia, cataracts, and other radiation-related illnesses.
For four decades, U.S. government scientists returned to the Marshall Islands to conduct exams and collect blood, tissue, bone marrow, teeth, and other samples. These studies generated a broad array of scientific findings, including the recognition that not only can acute exposures to radiation stimulate short-term effects but that late effects can emerge years and decades following the initial exposure. For example, by studying the Marshallese population, scientists found that radio-iodine-131 adheres to and accumulates in the thyroid, stimulating the production of benign and cancerous nodules and interfering with the production of hormones, leaving pregnant women and children especially vulnerable. They also discovered that people who were not exposed to an acute level of ionizing radiation but were exposed to low-levels on a daily basis because they lived in an area contaminated by fallout also developed thyroid and other radiogenic problems. The lessons learned by scientists included an awareness of the many complicated ways that radiation adversely affects the human body.
The Rongelap study was structured in ways that required the involvement of children from other atolls, especially children in the southern part of the nation. Such involvement extended over decades. Control subjects were selected at the direction of authorities. Being singled out resulted in social stigmatization (people were shunned because of the social perception that all people studied by the medical survey team were damaged by radiation). Control subject experiences included thorough examinations with photographs and x-rays; measurement of internal radiation with whole-body counters; the sampling of blood, bone marrow, skin, and other tissue; and, on a number of occasions, the injection of radioisotopes, vaccines, and other nonexplained substances. The experience of serving as a research control was intrusive, painful, and potentially harmful to the health of the participant.
The research agenda was shaped to meet U.S. military and scientific research objectives rather than the personal health needs of the affected population. The pressing question for the U.S. government was how to document and interpret the Marshallese experience in ways that might predict the consequences for U.S. troops or U.S. citizens exposed to radiation in the event of nuclear war. Marshallese health concerns, especially worries that radiation from fallout remained in their environment, poisoning their food and their bodies, were often ignored.
The classified nature of this research had profound effects within the Marshall Islands and within the broader scientific research community. Research protocols, data, and findings were restricted to those with security clearance. Patients, and later the Marshall Islands government, were denied access to medical records generated by this research.
This biomedical research was conducted by Brookhaven National Laboratory with monies appropriated by the U.S. Congress for the health of the Rongelap people. However, rather than investments in local health infrastructure, funds were used to periodically transport medical staff and supplies from the United States to the Marshall Islands for brief examinations of the "exposed" and "control" populations; to analyze the samples that were collected; to occasionally treat conditions that were defined as radiogenic in nature; and, in later years, to acquire and supply a ship with the necessary technology to conduct whole-body counting, x-ray, and other laboratory procedures. Some of the residents who developed thyroid tumors and other radiogenic conditions were brought to the United States for study and surgical removal of the thyroid gland.
When the U.S. government states that it has provided millions of dollars to the Marshall Islands for issues related to the weapons testing, it does not mention that enormous portions of this money went into advancing U.S. scientific interests, not into services for the people.
The culture of secrecy that characterized biomedical research in the Marshall Islands facilitated efforts to shape public opinion on the safety of the nuclear weapons testing program. Scientific findings were cherry-picked: those studies released to the public were carefully selected; conclusions were carefully worded to support the contention that exposed communities suffered no lasting effects from their exposure and that their exposure presented no threat to the health of subsequent generations. Manipulated "findings" were used to counter calls within the United Nations to establish a ban on nuclear weapons testing; to calm local and regional complaints that exposure to radiation was producing a wide array of untreated health effects, especially reproductive effects; and to reduce the economic liability of the U.S. government in meeting its obligations to its former territory.
As the decades passed, people experienced a growing incidence of adverse health effects, most notably the late onset of thyroid cancer and stunted growth and retardation in children in "exposed" as well as "control" populations. These health problems fed concerns that Rongelap Atoll was still dangerously contaminated and posed a significant hazard to occupants, a fact that became evident in the restudy of radiological conditions in the northern Marshall Islands in 1978. The results of this survey and the input of a few independent foreign experts led the Rongelapese to evacuate their homes in 1985, with the assistance of the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior on what proved to be its final voyage in the Pacific. The evacuation of Rongelap occurred without the assistance or approval of the U.S. government. The restudy confirmed that much of the northern Marshall Islands was indeed still contaminated and that some areas would not be habitable without extensive remediation for at least twenty-five thousand years.
In 1986, after years of negotiations and the threat of some $7.1 billion in damage claims making their way through the U.S. court system, the United States and the Republic of the Marshall Islands signed a Compact of Free Association, releasing the U.S. government from pending legal claims through the establishment of a compensation trust fund. The Compact of Free Association requires the United States to continue efforts to adequately address the full range of damages and injuries resulting from the testing program. Section 177 of the compact outlines responsibilities for monitoring the environment and human health effects of radiation from the nuclear weapons tests in the northern Marshall Islands (Bikini and Enewetak, the two ground-zero locations and Rongelap and Utrik atolls, the two communities enrolled in the Project 4.1 biomedical study). An additional provision of section 177 enables the Republic of the Marshall Islands to petition the U.S. Congress for additional compensatory funds should conditions change or new information come to light. Congress set aside $150 million to fund the provisions of the initial compact, which established a compensation trust fund with funds administered through a Nuclear Claims Tribunal that receives claims and issues awards for personal injury and property damage.
When the Compact of Free Association was negotiated and the Nuclear Claims Tribunal established much of the scientific record was classified: The Marshallese were never fully briefed on the nature of the nuclear weapons testing program and the full extent of its damages. This inequitable access to fundamental information has severely hampered Marshallese efforts to achieve a meaningful and comprehensive remedy. For example, to this day, the United States acknowledges in its compensatory programs the obligation to address nuclear-weapons-related damage to property and people in only four atolls: Bikini, Enewetak, Rongelap and Utrik. The U.S. documentary record tells another story: a 1955 survey, declassified in 1994 and released to the RMI in 1995, reports fallout from the 1954 Bravo test occurring at hazardous levels on twenty-eight atolls throughout the Marshall Islands. The entire nation, not simply the four atolls, is downwind, and the whole country has been adversely affected by nuclear weapons.
Today, the Rongelap community lives in exile, largely on borrowed or rented lands in Kwajalein and Majuro atolls. Recent efforts to remediate fallout hazards on areas of some islands and to rebuild homes and community structure on the island of Rongelap suggest that the community may, someday soon, have the choice of returning home. Whether or not remediation is successful and people decide to return remains to be seen.
The Marshallese have suffered more illness, death, and grief than any population should endure, and historical wrongs resulting from the nuclear weapons testing program have been compounded by inadequate and underfunded medical assistance. Despite the seriously elevated cancer rates in the Marshall Islands, as of this writing there is no oncologist in the country. There is no ability to provide chemotherapy or radiation treatment. Perhaps worst of all, there is no ability to undertake a nationwide screening for cancer to catch the illness in its early stages and provide patients with the greatest chance for survival and an improved quality of life.
A minimalist approach to health care has been provided through the Compact of Free Association (177 Agreement): Some seventeen thousand people receive health care through the 177 Health Care Program established to address the radiogenic health issues of the people of Enewetak, Bikini, Rongelap, and Utrik islands. This system is woefully underfunded and lacks comprehensive cancer treatment capability. Many people have filed personal-injury claims with the Nuclear Claims Tribunal and, with their compensation, moved to Hawaii and the continental United States seeking, among other things, better health care. The NCT has ordered millions of dollars in compensation for personal-injury claims, but many more people have been found eligible than originally anticipated. Thus the majority of awards have yet to be paid in full to victims or their surviving families. And while a compensatory payment provides assistance at one level or another, in no way does it provide the means to restore overall health.
What is clearly lacking in the Marshall Islands, and sorely needed, is a high-quality medical care program that would address direct and indirect health problems caused by U.S. activities during the nuclear test period, and build the capacity of the Marshall Islands to address these needs.
The story of Rongelap is one of systemic injury, and inadequate and at times abusive response on the part of the U.S. government. U.S. government activities in the Marshall Islands resulted in profound consequences for the entire nation, unmet U.S. obligations, and an intergenerational responsibility. Under the Bush Administration, the U.S. government views its responsibility to its former territorial possession, and those people adversely affected by the nuclear weapons testing program, as a set of limited obligations that have in large part been addressed.
Political administrations come and go, but radiogenic contamination and disease present protracted, ulcerating, intergenerational problems. The toxic and radioactive contamination of soil, water, terrestrial and marine biota, and human life that is the legacy of nuclear war games in the Marshall Islands is difficult and expensive to monitor, let alone remediate. The health complications of radiation exposure for individuals and their offspring are similarly expensive to monitor and treat. Nevertheless, just as the U.S. government continues to appropriate billions of dollars for the cleanup of the plutonium processing plant in Hanford, Washington, and as it continues to make appropriations to provide full compensation to people living downwind from the Nevada Test Site, so too must it honor commitments to the inhabitants of the former trust territory, who deserve the same level of health care and cleanup as U.S. citizens.
In today's world-where uranium mining occurs at historic levels, where depleted uranium is widely used in military training and war, and where nuclear power and weapons production are again on the agendas of the world's nations-these lessons have currency. The experiences of the people of Rongelap, whose lives were transformed not only by acute exposure but also by chronic exposure to low-level radiation, should be read as a timely, cautionary tale.
This essay is excerpted from The Consequential Dangers of Nuclear War: the Rongelap Report
Barbara Rose Johnston is an anthropologist and senior research fellow at the Center for Political Ecology, and a member of the expert advisory group for UNESCO�s Water and Cultural Diversity Project.� She is the co-author of The Consequential Dangers of Nuclear War: the Rongelap Report. Her documentation of dam legacy issues in Guatemala is available in Spanish and English at http://www.centerforpoliticalecology.org/chixoy.html. She can be reached at: bjohnston@igc.org
Holly M. Barker served as the advisor to the Republic of the Marshall Islands Embassy for 18 years and now teaches anthropology as a full-time lecturer a the University of Washington. Her latest book is Consequential Damages of Nuclear War - The Rongelap Report, by Barbara Rose Johnston and Holly M. Barker (Left Coast Press 2008). She can be contacted at hmbarker@u.washington.edu.
23 November 2008 in Alternative Energy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
With all the "Drill Baby Drill" commentary from the last election, perhaps we should reconsider the direction we are taking. Here is one such caution:
Cautionary Tales From a Nuclear War Zone
By BARBARA ROSE JOHNSTON
and HOLLY M. BARKER
John Anjain, Alab of Rongelap, Marshall Islands:
November 23, 2008 "Counterpunch" -- - Early in the morning of March 1, 1954, sometime around five or six o'clock, American planes dropped a hydrogen bomb on Bikini Atoll. Shortly before this happened, I had awakened and stepped out of my house. Once outside, I looked around and saw Billiet Edmond making coffee near his house. I walked up and stood next to him. The two of us talked about going fishing later in the morning. After only a few minutes had passed we saw a light to the west of Rongelap Atoll. When this light reached Rongelap we saw many beautiful colors. I expect the reason people didn't go inside their houses right away was because the yellow, green, pink, red, and blue colors which they saw were such a beautiful sight before their eyes.
The second thing that happened involved the gust of wind that came from the explosion. The wind was so hot and strong that some people who were outside staggered, including Billiet and I. Even some windows fell as a result of the wind.
The third thing that happened concerned the smoke-cloud which we saw from the bomb blast. The smoke rose quickly to the clouds and as it reached them we heard a sound louder than thunder. When people heard this deafening clap some of the women and children fled to the woods. Once the sound of the explosion had died out everyone began cooking, some made donuts and others cooked rice.
Later some men went fishing, including myself. Around nine or ten-o'clock I took my throw net and left to go fishing near Jabwon. As I walked along the beach I looked at the sky and saw it was white like smoke; nevertheless I kept on going. When I reached Jabwon, or even a little before, I began to feel a fine powder falling all over my body and into my eyes. I felt it but I didn't know what it was.
I went ahead with my fishing and caught enough fish with my throw-net to fill a bag. Then I went to the woods to pick some coconuts. I came back to the beach and sat on a rock to drink the coconuts and eat some raw fish. As I was sitting and eating, the powder began to fall harder. I looked out and saw that the coconuts had changed color. By now all the trees were white as well as my entire body. I gazed up at the sky but couldn't see the clouds because it was so misty. I didn't believe this was dangerous. I only knew that powder was falling. I was somewhat afraid nevertheless.
When I returned to Rongelap village I saw people cooking food outside their cook-houses. They didn't know the powder was very dangerous. The powder fell all day and night long over the entire atoll of Rongelap. During the night people were sick. They were nauseous, they had stomach, head, ear, leg and shoulder aches. People did not sleep that night because they were sick.
The next day, March 2, 1954, people got up in the morning and went down to get water. It had turned a yellowish color. "Oh, Oh" they cried out and said "the powder that fell down yesterday and last night is a harmful thing." They were sick and so Jabwe, the health-aide, walked around in the morning and warned the people not to drink the water. He told them that if they were thirsty to drink coconuts only.
. . . At three o'clock in the afternoon of March 2, 1954 a seaplane from Enewetak Atoll landed in the lagoon of Rongelap and two men came ashore. Billiet and I asked them why they had come to Rongelap and they responded by saying they had come to inspect the damage caused by the bomb. They said they would spend twenty minutes looking at all the wells, cement water catchments, houses and other things. The two men returned quickly to their plane and left without telling anyone that the food, water, and other things were harmful to human beings.
Everyone was quite surprised at the speed with which the men surveyed everything in the island and then returned to their plane. People said maybe we've been really harmed because the men were in such a hurry to leave. Although they said they would look around for about twenty minutes, they probably didn't stay here for more than ten minutes. So in less than ten minutes after their arrival on Rongelap, the two men had already taken off.
. . . On that day we looked at the water catchments, tubs and other places where there was a great deal of water stored. The water had turned a strong yellow and those who drank it said it tasted bitter.
On March 3, early in the morning, a ship and a seaplane with four propellers appeared on Rongelap. Out of the plane came Mr. Oscar de[Brum] - and Mr. Wiles, the governor of Kwajelein Atoll. As their boat reached the shore, Mr. Oscar cried out to the people to get on board and forget about their personal belongings for whoever thought of staying behind would die. Such were the words by which he spoke to them. Therefore, none of the people went back to their houses, but immediately got on the boats and sailed to board the ship that would take them away. Those who were sick and old were evacuated by plane.
. . . At ten o'clock in the morning we left Rongelap for Ailinginae Atoll and arrived there at three in the afternoon. We picked up nineteen people on this atoll and by five o'clock we were on our way to Kwajalein.
On March 4, we arrived on Kwajalein and met the Admiral who then sent us to where we were to stay. A day later, Dr. Conard and his medical team arrived. The doctors were very thorough in checking and caring for our injuries and showed much concern in examining us. The Admiral was also very concerned about our situation and took us in as if we were his own children. His name was Admiral Clark.
Ever since 1954 Dr. Conard has continued to examine the fallout victims on a yearly basis. These visits are very important for all the people on Rongelap and others in the Marshall Islands. These medical examinations are also of great importance for men throughout the world.
. . . From 1959 to 1963 and 1964, after the Rongelapese had returned to Rongelap from Majuro, many women gave birth prematurely to babies which looked somewhat like animals. Women also had miscarriages. During these years many other strange things happened with regard to food, especially to fish in which the fertilized eggs and liver turned a blackish color. In all my forty years I had never seen this happen in fish either on Rongelap or in any of the other places I've been in the Marshall Islands. Also, when people ate fish or [arrowroot] starch produced on Rongelap, they developed a rash in their mouths. This too I had never seen before.
. . . I, John, Anjain, was magistrate of Rongelap when all this occurred and I now write this to explain what happened to the Rongelap people at that time.
[In 1954] the people of Rongelap stayed on Kwajalein for three months and the DOE [Atomic Energy Commission] people removed the Rongelap people to Majuro. The people lived in Majuro for three years and in 1956 the DOE, Trust Territory government and the UN came to Majuro and I went with them to attend a meeting with them at the school in Rita. And they told me that it is time that we go back home. And I asked "are we really going home while Rongelap is contaminated?" And the answer that they give me is that "it is true that Rongelap is contaminated but it is not dangerous. And if you don't believe us, well then stay here and take care of yourself."
. . . In 1957 the people returned to Rongelap and the DOE promised that there wouldn't be any problems to the Rongelap people. However in 1958 and 1959 most of the women gave birth to something that was not resembling human beings. There was a woman giving birth to a grape. Another woman gave birth to something that resembles a monkey. And so on. There was a child born at that time and there was no shell covering the top of that child's head.
The American doctors came every year to examine us. Every year they came, and they told us that we were not sick, and then they would return the next year. But they did find something wrong. They found one boy did not grow as fast as boys his age. They gave him medicine. Then they began finding the thyroid sickness.
My son Lekoj was thirteen when they found his thyroid was sick. They took him away to a hospital in America. They cut out his thyroid. They gave him some medicine and told him to take it every day for the rest of his life. The same thing happened to other people. The doctors kept returning and examining us. Several years ago, they took me to a hospital in America, and they cut out my thyroid. They gave me medicine and told me to take it every day for the rest of my life.
A few years after the bomb, Senator Amata Kabua tried to get some compensation for the people of Rongelap. He got a lawyer, and the lawyer made a case in court. The court turned our case down. The court said it could not consider our case because we were not part of the United States. Dwight Heine went to the United Nations to tell them about us. People from the United Nations came to see us, and we told them how we felt. Finally, in 1964, the U.S. Congress passed a bill. The bill gave us money as a payment for our experience. Some of the people spent all their money; some of them still have money in the bank. After we got the money, they began finding the thyroid sickness.
In 1972, they took Lekoj away again. They said they wanted to examine him. They took him to America to a big hospital near Washington. Later, they took me to this hospital near Washington because they said he was very sick. My son Lekoj died after [I] arrived. He never saw his island again. He returned home in a box. He is buried on our island. The doctors say he had a sickness called leukemia. They are quite sure it was from the bomb.
But I am positive.
I saw the ash fall on him. I know it was the bomb. I watched him die.
***
Statement of Almira Matayoshi to the Nuclear Claims Tribunal, Marshall Islands (2001):
I was pregnant when they dropped the bomb [Bravo]. I was flown off of Rongelap with the other pregnant women and elderly people. The rest of the people left on the boat. I gave birth to Robert on Ejit, and he was normal. The child I had after Robert, when we had returned to Rongelap, I gave birth to something that was like grapes. I felt like I was going to die from the loss of blood. My vision was gone, and I was fading in and out of consciousness. They emergency evacuated me to Kwajalein, and I was sure I was going to die. After the grapes, I had a third child. It wasn't like a child at all. It had no bones and was all skin. When I gave birth they said, "Ak ta men en?" [What is that thing?]. Mama said uror [a term denoting exacerbation]. It was the first strange child that people had seen. I was the first. That time was the worst in my life. I feel both angry and embarrassed.
***
What words can possibly communicate what it is like to see and survive such sights? To become increasingly fearful that the intense beauty of your world-the water, the sand, the plants, the soil, the sea, and all the creatures within-has been fundamentally transformed by invisible, untouchable, all-encompassing poison? After years and years of living in a radioactive laboratory as the subject of scrutiny and study, what does it mean to find your fears confirmed-that your favorite foods are taboo, that your loved ones grow old before their time and your children fail to thrive? What does it mean to "survive" downwind from the the United States proving grounds - where nuclear war was practiced and perfected by Cold War warriors?
In 1946, after evacuating the people of Bikini and nearby atoll communities in the Marshall Islands, the United States detonated two atomic weapons: the same type of bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki in 1945. In 1947 the United Nations designated the Marshall Islands a United States Trust Territory. Over the next eleven years, this U.S. territory played host to another sixty-five atmospheric atomic and thermonuclear tests. The largest of these tests, code named Bravo, was detonated on March 1, 1954. This 15-megaton hydrogen bomb was purposefully exploded close to the ground. It melted huge quantities of coral atoll, sucking it up and mixing it with radiation released by the weapon before depositing it on the islands and inhabitants in the form of ash, or radioactive fallout. The wind was blowing that morning in the direction of inhabited atolls, including Rongelap and Utrik, some 100 and 300 miles from the test site at Bikini. The Marshallese communities on Rongelap, Ailinginae, and Utrik atolls, U.S. servicemen on Rongerik Atoll (weathermen who were monitoring winds and fallout), and the twenty-three-man crew of the Japanese fishing vessel Fukuryu Maru (Lucky Dragon) received near-lethal doses of radiation from the Bravo event.
International protests and calls for a ban on nuclear weapons testing prompted the U.S. government to publicly acknowledge the incident and accept liability. The Marshallese filed an April 20, 1954, complaint to the United Nations Trusteeship Council:
We, the Marshallese people feel that we must follow the dictates of our consciences to bring forth this urgent plea to the United Nations, which has pledged itself to safeguard the life, liberty and the general well being of the people of the Trust Territory, of which the Marshallese people are a part.
. . . The Marshallese people are not only fearful of the danger to their persons from these deadly weapons in case of another miscalculation, but they are also very concerned for the increasing number of people who are being removed from their land.
. . . Land means a great deal to the Marshallese. It means more than just a place where you can plant your food crops and build your houses; or a place where you can bury your dead. It is the very life of the people. Take away their land and their spirits go also.
In response to this petition the United States assured the General Assembly of the United Nations:
The fact that anyone was injured by recent nuclear tests in the Pacific has caused the American people genuine and deep regret. . . . The United States Government considers the resulting petition of the Marshall Islanders to be both reasonable and helpful. . . . The Trusteeship Agreement of 1947 which covers the Marshall Islands was predicated upon the fact that the United Nations clearly approved these islands as a strategic area in which atomic tests had already been held. Hence, from the onset, it was clear that the right to close areas for security reasons anticipated closing them for atomic tests, and the United Nations was so notified; such tests were conducted in 1948, 1951, 1952 as well as in 1954. . . . The question is whether the United States authorities in charge have exercised due precaution in looking after the safety and welfare of the Islanders involved. That is the essence of their petition and it is entirely justified. In reply, it can be categorically stated that no stone will be left unturned to safeguard the present and future well-being of the Islanders.
The United States promised the Marshallese and the United Nations General Assembly that "Guarantees are given the Marshallese for fair and just compensation for losses of all sorts."
These guarantees worked: the United States was able to continue its atmospheric weapons testing program in the Marshall Islands through 1958 and at its Nevada test site through 1963, when the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union finally signed on to a limited test ban treaty.
The United States has not, however, fully lived up to its promises to the United Nations or the Marshallese people to safeguard their well-being. Atmospheric weapons testing in the Pacific resulted in considerable human and environmental harm.
Atmospheric nuclear weapons tests released numerous radioisotopes and dangerous heavy metals. An estimated 2 percent of the radioactive fallout was iodine-131, a highly radioactive isotope with an 8-day half-life. The nuclear war games conducted by the United States in the Marshall Islands released some 8 billion curies of iodine-131. To place this figure in broader context, over the entire history of nuclear weapons testing at the Nevada Proving Grounds, some 150 million curies of iodine-131 were released, and varying analyses of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster estimate an iodine-131 release of 40 to 54 million curies. Much of the iodine-131 released in the Marshall Islands was the by-product of the March 1, 1954, Bravo test detonation of the hydrogen bomb. Designed to produce and contain as much radioactive fallout in the immediate area as possible, in order to create laboratory-like conditions, Bravo unleashed as much explosive yield as one thousand Hiroshima-sized bombs. Communities living downwind from the blast, especially the Rongelap community, were acutely exposed to its fallout.
Evacuated three days after the blast, the people of Rongelap spent three months under intense medical scrutiny as human subjects in Project 4.1. They spent three years as refugees and were returned to their still-contaminated atoll in 1957 with assurances that their islands were now safe. They lived on Rongelap for another twenty-eight years and as the closest populated atoll to the Pacific Proving Grounds, they were exposed to additional fallout from another series of nuclear tests in 1958. While living on Rongelap, the community was visited annually, and later biannually, by U.S. government scientists and medical doctors conducting follow-up studies begun under Project 4.1. Researchers collected fish, plants, soil, and human body samples to document the presence of radioisotopes deposited from sixty-seven tests, the movement of these isotopes through the food chain and the human body, and the adverse health impact of this radiation on the human body.
The community left Rongelap in 1985 after receiving information from some U.S. scientists that confirmed their long-held fears that their ancestral homeland was contaminated with radiation at levels that posed a serious risk to their health. Today, the Rongelap community lives in exile, largely on borrowed or rented lands in Kwajalein and Majuro atolls. Recent efforts to remediate fallout hazards on areas of some islands and to rebuild homes and community structure on the island of Rongelap suggest that the community may, someday soon, have the choice of returning home. Whether or not remediation is successful and people decide to return remains to be seen�
The people of Rongelap are not the only nuclear nomads created by the actions of military and nuclear powers over the past six decades. They are, however, one of the most studied communities.
Following their acute exposure in 1954 the people of Rongelap enrolled in a medical research program sponsored by the Atomic Energy Commission. The program was designed to document the movement of radiation through the atmosphere, food chain, and human body, with the goal of understanding the long-term effects of human exposure to ionizing radiation.
Over the years, U.S. scientists added to the research program "control" subjects, including people on Rongelap who were not present during the Bravo test, people on the nearby atoll of Utrik, people on Likiep (another populated atoll in the northern Marshall Islands), and people on Majuro. Control subjects were typically selected to match the acutely exposed by age and sex, and scientists studied these people in many instances for four decades. Comparative studies documented increases in thyroid disorders, stunted growth in children, and increases in many forms of cancer and leukemia, cataracts, and other radiation-related illnesses.
For four decades, U.S. government scientists returned to the Marshall Islands to conduct exams and collect blood, tissue, bone marrow, teeth, and other samples. These studies generated a broad array of scientific findings, including the recognition that not only can acute exposures to radiation stimulate short-term effects but that late effects can emerge years and decades following the initial exposure. For example, by studying the Marshallese population, scientists found that radio-iodine-131 adheres to and accumulates in the thyroid, stimulating the production of benign and cancerous nodules and interfering with the production of hormones, leaving pregnant women and children especially vulnerable. They also discovered that people who were not exposed to an acute level of ionizing radiation but were exposed to low-levels on a daily basis because they lived in an area contaminated by fallout also developed thyroid and other radiogenic problems. The lessons learned by scientists included an awareness of the many complicated ways that radiation adversely affects the human body.
The Rongelap study was structured in ways that required the involvement of children from other atolls, especially children in the southern part of the nation. Such involvement extended over decades. Control subjects were selected at the direction of authorities. Being singled out resulted in social stigmatization (people were shunned because of the social perception that all people studied by the medical survey team were damaged by radiation). Control subject experiences included thorough examinations with photographs and x-rays; measurement of internal radiation with whole-body counters; the sampling of blood, bone marrow, skin, and other tissue; and, on a number of occasions, the injection of radioisotopes, vaccines, and other nonexplained substances. The experience of serving as a research control was intrusive, painful, and potentially harmful to the health of the participant.
The research agenda was shaped to meet U.S. military and scientific research objectives rather than the personal health needs of the affected population. The pressing question for the U.S. government was how to document and interpret the Marshallese experience in ways that might predict the consequences for U.S. troops or U.S. citizens exposed to radiation in the event of nuclear war. Marshallese health concerns, especially worries that radiation from fallout remained in their environment, poisoning their food and their bodies, were often ignored.
The classified nature of this research had profound effects within the Marshall Islands and within the broader scientific research community. Research protocols, data, and findings were restricted to those with security clearance. Patients, and later the Marshall Islands government, were denied access to medical records generated by this research.
This biomedical research was conducted by Brookhaven National Laboratory with monies appropriated by the U.S. Congress for the health of the Rongelap people. However, rather than investments in local health infrastructure, funds were used to periodically transport medical staff and supplies from the United States to the Marshall Islands for brief examinations of the "exposed" and "control" populations; to analyze the samples that were collected; to occasionally treat conditions that were defined as radiogenic in nature; and, in later years, to acquire and supply a ship with the necessary technology to conduct whole-body counting, x-ray, and other laboratory procedures. Some of the residents who developed thyroid tumors and other radiogenic conditions were brought to the United States for study and surgical removal of the thyroid gland.
When the U.S. government states that it has provided millions of dollars to the Marshall Islands for issues related to the weapons testing, it does not mention that enormous portions of this money went into advancing U.S. scientific interests, not into services for the people.
The culture of secrecy that characterized biomedical research in the Marshall Islands facilitated efforts to shape public opinion on the safety of the nuclear weapons testing program. Scientific findings were cherry-picked: those studies released to the public were carefully selected; conclusions were carefully worded to support the contention that exposed communities suffered no lasting effects from their exposure and that their exposure presented no threat to the health of subsequent generations. Manipulated "findings" were used to counter calls within the United Nations to establish a ban on nuclear weapons testing; to calm local and regional complaints that exposure to radiation was producing a wide array of untreated health effects, especially reproductive effects; and to reduce the economic liability of the U.S. government in meeting its obligations to its former territory.
As the decades passed, people experienced a growing incidence of adverse health effects, most notably the late onset of thyroid cancer and stunted growth and retardation in children in "exposed" as well as "control" populations. These health problems fed concerns that Rongelap Atoll was still dangerously contaminated and posed a significant hazard to occupants, a fact that became evident in the restudy of radiological conditions in the northern Marshall Islands in 1978. The results of this survey and the input of a few independent foreign experts led the Rongelapese to evacuate their homes in 1985, with the assistance of the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior on what proved to be its final voyage in the Pacific. The evacuation of Rongelap occurred without the assistance or approval of the U.S. government. The restudy confirmed that much of the northern Marshall Islands was indeed still contaminated and that some areas would not be habitable without extensive remediation for at least twenty-five thousand years.
In 1986, after years of negotiations and the threat of some $7.1 billion in damage claims making their way through the U.S. court system, the United States and the Republic of the Marshall Islands signed a Compact of Free Association, releasing the U.S. government from pending legal claims through the establishment of a compensation trust fund. The Compact of Free Association requires the United States to continue efforts to adequately address the full range of damages and injuries resulting from the testing program. Section 177 of the compact outlines responsibilities for monitoring the environment and human health effects of radiation from the nuclear weapons tests in the northern Marshall Islands (Bikini and Enewetak, the two ground-zero locations and Rongelap and Utrik atolls, the two communities enrolled in the Project 4.1 biomedical study). An additional provision of section 177 enables the Republic of the Marshall Islands to petition the U.S. Congress for additional compensatory funds should conditions change or new information come to light. Congress set aside $150 million to fund the provisions of the initial compact, which established a compensation trust fund with funds administered through a Nuclear Claims Tribunal that receives claims and issues awards for personal injury and property damage.
When the Compact of Free Association was negotiated and the Nuclear Claims Tribunal established much of the scientific record was classified: The Marshallese were never fully briefed on the nature of the nuclear weapons testing program and the full extent of its damages. This inequitable access to fundamental information has severely hampered Marshallese efforts to achieve a meaningful and comprehensive remedy. For example, to this day, the United States acknowledges in its compensatory programs the obligation to address nuclear-weapons-related damage to property and people in only four atolls: Bikini, Enewetak, Rongelap and Utrik. The U.S. documentary record tells another story: a 1955 survey, declassified in 1994 and released to the RMI in 1995, reports fallout from the 1954 Bravo test occurring at hazardous levels on twenty-eight atolls throughout the Marshall Islands. The entire nation, not simply the four atolls, is downwind, and the whole country has been adversely affected by nuclear weapons.
Today, the Rongelap community lives in exile, largely on borrowed or rented lands in Kwajalein and Majuro atolls. Recent efforts to remediate fallout hazards on areas of some islands and to rebuild homes and community structure on the island of Rongelap suggest that the community may, someday soon, have the choice of returning home. Whether or not remediation is successful and people decide to return remains to be seen.
The Marshallese have suffered more illness, death, and grief than any population should endure, and historical wrongs resulting from the nuclear weapons testing program have been compounded by inadequate and underfunded medical assistance. Despite the seriously elevated cancer rates in the Marshall Islands, as of this writing there is no oncologist in the country. There is no ability to provide chemotherapy or radiation treatment. Perhaps worst of all, there is no ability to undertake a nationwide screening for cancer to catch the illness in its early stages and provide patients with the greatest chance for survival and an improved quality of life.
A minimalist approach to health care has been provided through the Compact of Free Association (177 Agreement): Some seventeen thousand people receive health care through the 177 Health Care Program established to address the radiogenic health issues of the people of Enewetak, Bikini, Rongelap, and Utrik islands. This system is woefully underfunded and lacks comprehensive cancer treatment capability. Many people have filed personal-injury claims with the Nuclear Claims Tribunal and, with their compensation, moved to Hawaii and the continental United States seeking, among other things, better health care. The NCT has ordered millions of dollars in compensation for personal-injury claims, but many more people have been found eligible than originally anticipated. Thus the majority of awards have yet to be paid in full to victims or their surviving families. And while a compensatory payment provides assistance at one level or another, in no way does it provide the means to restore overall health.
What is clearly lacking in the Marshall Islands, and sorely needed, is a high-quality medical care program that would address direct and indirect health problems caused by U.S. activities during the nuclear test period, and build the capacity of the Marshall Islands to address these needs.
The story of Rongelap is one of systemic injury, and inadequate and at times abusive response on the part of the U.S. government. U.S. government activities in the Marshall Islands resulted in profound consequences for the entire nation, unmet U.S. obligations, and an intergenerational responsibility. Under the Bush Administration, the U.S. government views its responsibility to its former territorial possession, and those people adversely affected by the nuclear weapons testing program, as a set of limited obligations that have in large part been addressed.
Political administrations come and go, but radiogenic contamination and disease present protracted, ulcerating, intergenerational problems. The toxic and radioactive contamination of soil, water, terrestrial and marine biota, and human life that is the legacy of nuclear war games in the Marshall Islands is difficult and expensive to monitor, let alone remediate. The health complications of radiation exposure for individuals and their offspring are similarly expensive to monitor and treat. Nevertheless, just as the U.S. government continues to appropriate billions of dollars for the cleanup of the plutonium processing plant in Hanford, Washington, and as it continues to make appropriations to provide full compensation to people living downwind from the Nevada Test Site, so too must it honor commitments to the inhabitants of the former trust territory, who deserve the same level of health care and cleanup as U.S. citizens.
In today's world-where uranium mining occurs at historic levels, where depleted uranium is widely used in military training and war, and where nuclear power and weapons production are again on the agendas of the world's nations-these lessons have currency. The experiences of the people of Rongelap, whose lives were transformed not only by acute exposure but also by chronic exposure to low-level radiation, should be read as a timely, cautionary tale.
This essay is excerpted from The Consequential Dangers of Nuclear War: the Rongelap Report
Barbara Rose Johnston is an anthropologist and senior research fellow at the Center for Political Ecology, and a member of the expert advisory group for UNESCO�s Water and Cultural Diversity Project.� She is the co-author of The Consequential Dangers of Nuclear War: the Rongelap Report. Her documentation of dam legacy issues in Guatemala is available in Spanish and English at http://www.centerforpoliticalecology.org/chixoy.html. She can be reached at: bjohnston@igc.org
Holly M. Barker served as the advisor to the Republic of the Marshall Islands Embassy for 18 years and now teaches anthropology as a full-time lecturer a the University of Washington. Her latest book is Consequential Damages of Nuclear War - The Rongelap Report, by Barbara Rose Johnston and Holly M. Barker (Left Coast Press 2008). She can be contacted at hmbarker@u.washington.edu.
23 November 2008 in Alternative Energy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Hybrid Powered diesel-electric motor
Added to MyBoatsGear on 6/8/2008
Our Review This diesel electric hybrid launched in January and now available through Chris Craft USA can cruise at 5 knots in electric mode only. The California Chris Craft site has a video showing the boat pulling away from the dock silently in electric mode. Once in open water and your ready to plane, the electric and diesel combines for fast acceleration and quick to plane. Steyr claims reduced fuel consumption. The battery is recharged while the diesel is running so you can return to the dock in complete silence. The National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA) and Boating Writers International (BWI) named the marine equipment innovation winners at the International BoatBuilders Exhibition & Conference (IBEX) in Miami. Steyr Motors took home the award this year in the Inboard Engines category for its Hybrid Drive. The company, known for its low emission, lightweight marine diesel engines, created an environmentally-friendly hybrid solution that not only promises zero emission and low speed maneuvering, but also eliminates the need for separate generator units for additional inboard equipment. "Steyr combined both a motor and generator function in one hybrid unit, thereby making diesel operation more efficient and totally electrical operation possible in a seamless transition, in a single unit," says Pike. " IBEX awards press release " MY COMMENT:The "green" attachment is the hybridization. Simple enough to acheive the result. Why can't Detroit do this? Another award for the engine STEYR MOTORS GmbH Wins DAME Award 2008 Bill Dixon, Chairman of the Jury of the DAME, presented the Award to the winner of the prestigious prize at the start of METS this morning to Steyr Motors GmbH for their hybrid propulsion system, which allows a yacht to operate in any of four modes. The engine itself can be used to start the engine, eliminating the need for a starter motor. The engine can also be used as a generator to charge the vessel’s batteries. It can be used as well to leave a harbour in the cruise mode under electric power at speeds up to 5 knots. And finally, the engine can be used in the "boost" mode in situations where additional power is required to get the boat onto a plane. The best part of this product is that the additional generator/motor adds only 100 mm (4.2 inches) to the overall length of the engine and an additional 75 kg (165.4 pounds) of weight, yet it produces an output of 7kW at 48 volts. The electric control unit uses CAN bus protocol to monitor and regulate the engine in each mode, thus allowing it to be linked to other "smart" engine controls.
23 November 2008 in Alternative Energy | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
23 November 2008 in Political Opinion | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
23 November 2008 in Political Opinion | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Click Here To Laugh Some More...
I included the above link to her blog so you could see just how ridiculous she is...
As John McCain would say, "'Mericans dodged a bullet and that bullet was Sarah Palin!"
This is an unedited excerpt from a blog entry. Glad these good Xtians set such a good example... I suggest reading the entire blog. Oh God, will historians have fun with this... Welcome To The PalinDrome: Sarah Palin's Blog October 02, 2008 "Debate Live Blog Guest Blogger: Todd Palin Well allright. Its my baby's time to shine! I'm here in St. Louis but I donno yet if Im actually gonna watch from the audience or not. I wont lie, I got bored earlier and got into the minibar, so Steve's been saying I don't get to go down and see the thing live. I said like hell I dont! But I don't know, also its pretty comfortable up here and I might be able to blog easier than from my blackberry. An its true Im feelin pretty good right now. 9:00 - OK, I'm at least starting things out up here in the room. Kind of flipping around, not sure where I'll end up but CNN is in the lead right now. They got these circles on the side of the TV, and a bunch of regular folks with dials to rate the whole thing. It's all pretty scientific, like how they score boxing. 9:03 - Blah blah blah I'm Joe Biden. Man who would even listen to this guy? He doesn't even drive a truck. 9:06 - Yeah, Sarah! Nice opener, baby. That thing about soccer was Steve's idea, its meant to get more hispanic people to vote for us. 9:08 - Was that a wink?! I mean fine, I know its TV, but Im just saying Brad better not be in this f***ing building. 9:11 - I think Sarah is right, the people need to rise up! We need to tear those Wall Street boys up, I am sick of them an I bet you are too. So now it's the Coal comments. Repubs give a whole new meaning to the word DESPERATION. Leave it James, it's all over now...." Posted by: Liger | November 04, 2008 at 01:42 AM It's the ANNOINTMENT not the ABUSE It's the HUMANITY not the DEPRAVITY It's the COOPERATION not the CALCIFICATION It's the HUMILITY not the BRAVADO It's the PEACE not the WAR MONGERING It's the FRIENDSHIP not the ENMITY It's the REACHING OUT not the REJECTION It's BARACK/JOE not JOHN/SARAH Posted by: Liger | November 04, 2008 at 04:45 AM GOTTA GO VOTE NOW...I HAVE A HEADACHE. SEE YOU GUYS LATER..IF THE BLOG IS STILL HERE!! HAD PROBLEMS LAST NIGHT GETTING TO IT. THOUGHT THE REPUBLI-CONS WERE SCREWING WITH IT. ITS GONNA BE A LONG NIGHT..... JAMES THE FEGER: SORRY, JIMMY, BUT BY TONIGHT ITS GONNA BE "LIBERAL LAND" DON'TCHYA KNOW!! ITS OBAMA/BIDEN...BY A LANDSLIDE!! :) Posted by: LauralovesTerriers | November 04, 2008 at 11:48 AM WOW It seems as though the writting and thoughts styles have changed here: Poems and word association thoughts! This might be turning into a sublime form of thought control. I'm not a Liberal. But, I did like the phrase Jim the Feger, it kind of reminds me of Joe the Plummer, or Jake the Miner or John & Joan of America. Thanks for that association. The Mac is Back, McCain and will be the President of the United States of America very soon! Posted by: James W. Feger | November 04, 2008 at 02:34 PM McCAIN TO PENNSYLVANIA: MY FRIENDS? MY FRIENDS? WHERE THE HELL ARE YA? HEH? MY FRIENDS? GODAMIT PENNSYLVANIA SONOFABITCHES ABANDONED ME!! WE WERE GONNA FIGHT, GOD DAMIT, FIGHT, FIGHT AND STAND UP AND FIGHT!! REMEMBER? HEH? HEH? GOD DAMN SCRANTON.... MY FRIENDS? my friends??? :( Posted by: LauralovesTerriers | November 04, 2008 at 07:34 PM MCCAIN TO OHIO: MY FRIENDS...MY FRIENDS??!! WHERE THE HELL ARE YA, OHIO FRIENDS?? HEH? HEH? YOU WERE SUPPOSED TA STAND UP AND FIGHT!! FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT fight fight fighhhh....CINDEEE!! WHERE THE HELL ARE YA, I NEED MY SEDATIVE! GODAMIT, WHERE IS EVERYBODY? KENTUCKY?? THERE YOU ARE, MY FRIENDS!! OKLAHOMA, YOU'RE MY FRIEND, MY FRIENDS, BUT...BUT I WANTED OHIO, GODAM SONSOFBITCHES TURNCOATS TO BLUE, WHAT THE F---K? CINDY, GET ME THAT F-----N SEDATIVE!! Posted by: LauralovesTerriers | November 04, 2008 at 08:24 PM Barack has finished measuring the white house drapes and is now measuring the carpet area of the Oval office. Thanks for the entertainment Lauraloves and James W.Feger. My apologies James if I said anything nasty. Give Barack all necessary cooperation. It's going to be an extremely difficult Presidency. Give him a chance, Give decency a chance. See you guys in 2012. Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee------------ Posted by: Liger | November 04, 2008 at 08:58 PM HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WE WON WE WON WE WON!!!!!!! OBAMA/BIDEN 2008--- WHERE ARE YA, JAMES THE FEGER? A SHOUTOUT TO YA LIGER AND ANY OTHER OF THE VICTORIOUS ON HERE!! :) Posted by: LauralovesTerriers | November 04, 2008 at 10:10 PM IT WAS A GREAT TWO MONTHS ON HERE WITH ALL OF YOU...AND I'LL HAVE A SPECIAL PLACE IN MY HEART FOR YOU, LIGER, AND YOU TOO JAMES!!!!! I'M REALY GOING TO MISS THIS SITE, SO MANY LAUGHS! WE SHOULD ALL BE ROOTING FOR OUR COUNTRY TONIGHT AND WISH US WELL AND WISH US SAFE.. A SHOUT OUT FOR BIPARTISANSHIP!!!! LOVE, LAURA IN NEW YORK (Wink Wink) Posted by: LauralovesTerriers | November 04, 2008 at 10:15 PM Congatulations Obama! The last time I voted Democrat was for Jimmy Carter. I'm never going to hear the end of this. My wife is an Obama person. Now we know what Obama has done! Posted by: James W. Feger | November 05, 2008 at 12:40 AM HA HA JAMES, so I guess you WON'T be sleeping with Mother Goose tonight, but a Democrat Obama voting wife!! Good for her! Maybe she'll write poems for you too? ha And thanks for the "congrats to Obama" and I laughed at your last line! I have to admit that John McCain was very gracious in his concession speech towards Obama. Lots of feel good moments tonight. Hey, what state are you in, if you don't mind telling us? Wish you the best, James the Feger, and thanks for being my "muse"!! Posted by: LauralovesTerriers | November 05, 2008 at 01:04 AM Just a final thought Lauraloves and James: Yes John McCain's final speech was indeed gracious. Nice to know you both. By the way, I (Liger) am an Indian writing from Mumbai (India). Just a small secret that I wanted to share with you guys before I go. Congratulations America : The world rejoices with you. Posted by: Liger | November 05, 2008 at 01:16 AM And the best to you both. I'm originally from San Francisco, California. I'm now living on the island of Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, U.S.A. We are out on the Pacific Rim about 100 miles north of Guam. It has been good writing with you and trading the wits! It's a great country. Posted by: James W. Feger | November 05, 2008 at 02:11 AM omfg!!!omoma won!! wat a ****er i h8 him he is such a idiot he odviously has secret intentions and to top it off he wants 2 call the iraq war off(after he insulted it by calling it a mistake)! he went to a muslim school and said he isn't, yer what ever. i wanted jhon to win, i dont care if he is called a lier i'ld rarther have a lier than a terrorist as president!(im not raicest im just uncomfatable with a terrorist running the most "powerful" nation on the planet.) i think sara(one day) would make a fine president, she's brainy(countering barick's campaings) and is some one we can relate to; she has kids, "a hockey mom" likes to have fun(shooting) when have we had a truly powerful leader? bush was just feared and a lil on the crazy side, but was ok i guess. don't worry mc caine he'll screw up and then you can take over. =] Posted by: meow meow cat | November 05, 2008 at 10:54 AM WHAT THE ?? I'M THE ONLY ONE FROM "THE ORIGINAL THREE" (ME, LIGER, FEGER)FROM THE MAINLAND!!!!! HA THAT WAS A SURPRISE! JAMES THE FEGER, you got to vote, right? Wondering how or why you got all the way over there, from San Fransisco! Do you miss living in the USA? And LIGER...not even an AMERICAN!! Oh, you pulled a good one on us, ha ha I thought you were English or Canadian cause of your spelling (words like honour,etc.)and some other hints you weren't American, but figured you did LIVE here! OH AND JAMES, I too live on an island...LONG ISLAND!! ha ha ha GREAT TIME WITH YOU GUYS AND ON "SARAH'S" blogsite and I thank our fake Sarah for giving us this opportunity and hope you are okay, since we haven't heard from you since Oct.2!! :( Come visit New York, Liger and James the Feger; its a great city. Oh, and by the way, my Terrier, Moxie, could run this country better than Sarah Palin!! :) Posted by: LauralovesTerriers | November 05, 2008 at 07:41 PM I have never been more proud to be an American as I was last night! I knew Obama was the best choice. Goodluck Palin Family. Enjoy the new grandbaby. I hope little Cialis doesn't hate you to much for the name lol. Posted by: Obama Supporter 4 a Better America | November 06, 2008 at 12:03 AM But Lauraloves, would your terrier look as good in lipstick as a pitbull? Posted by: Jessy | November 06, 2008 at 09:10 AM Why yes, she would, Jessy. ha ha That was a good one! Why didn't I think of it myself? Posted by: LauralovesTerriers | November 06, 2008 at 03:28 PM Hey Sarah, it sure is COOOOOOOLD back in Alaska, ain't it? Saw yer breath coming out of ya lipsticked mouth at the airport! You and Todd can go back to your igloo or that garish red house Todd built for ya, that they showed on tv, and make some hot moose stew for ya brood....maybe make another baby while your'e at it? I see the name "Cialis" is taken, for Bristol's upcoming Virgin Birth, so you can call it "Viagra." Or if its a boy, Joe Theplumber Palin." Love, Laura from the Lower 48 Posted by: LauralovesTerriers | November 06, 2008 at 03:36 PM Visit Sarah Palin's new election website: http://www.sarah-palin.com/ Thanks =). SP Posted by: Sarah Palin | November 06, 2008 at 09:18 PM Sarah, Our Holy Father up in Heaven has answered all of our prayers. Jesus has brought us President Obama. The hand of God has spoken. Praise Jesus. Best Regards, The Holy Spirit. Posted by: The Holy Spirit | November 07, 2008 at 06:16 PM Sarah, Our Holy Father up in Heaven has answered all of our prayers. Jesus has brought us President Obama. The hand of God has spoken. Praise Jesus. Best Regards, The Holy Spirit. Posted by: The Holy Spirit | November 07, 2008 at 06:18 PM JESUS, ITS SARAH. Why didn't you tell me that Africa is a continent?? I always listen to EVERYTHING you tell me, but gosh darn it, but I swear I didnt' know the gotcha media was goin to quiz me on things like Africa, (which I can't see from my house) and what countries make up North America and all that NY Times type of stuff!! And now they want to come to my beloved Alaska and look in my closets for the expensive clothes!!?? Jesus, please help me, I am goin to cry in front of all those eliteish Liberell reporters!! Love, SARAH (the gift that keeps on givin') Posted by: LauralovesTerriers | November 07, 2008 at 08:58 PM I'm really embarrasssed to admit this, but before I heard about this $150,000 clothes buying thing that Sarah did, I didn't even know that Neiman Marcus was a fancy store--always thought it was some foreign chocolate that rich people ate. If I could get a couple of new dresses at Target, that would make me plenty happy right now, and I'm sure I could do it with $150.00 at most plus change. Most of the folks in my town would probably say the same thing. Posted by: Shannon | November 07, 2008 at 11:34 PM Pleeeeeeeez--you can't expect a VP candidate to go campaigning in clothes from Target or Walmart. And if you live in a town where nobody even knows about Neiman Marcus, you really shouldn't enter a discussion that's way over your head. In fact, next time, please don't even vote, just stay home, and make gourmet jello or whatever you eat to treat yourself on special occasions. Posted by: Deb | November 08, 2008 at 11:12 AM I know that I know that I KNOW that Neiman Marcus is not somethin' like Godiva Chocolate but a fancy clothes wearin' store that the California elites go to after they sip their cappachinos and Lattays while readin' that darn NY Times to find out who's in NAFTA and where all the continents are that I can't see from my pretty red house in my beloved Alaska in the house that Todd built. Posted by: LauralovesTerriers | November 08, 2008 at 05:49 PM Palin-Portman 2012 I also want to help Sarah Palin defeat Barack Obama in 2012 by sugesting the right running mate. I believe the best running mate for Sarah Palin would be someone else who was also on John McCain's short list, that being Bush budget director Rob Portman of Ohio. He would be the best for Sarah Palin based on a threefold superioity that only he has, which are as follows: ideology, geography, and economy. Ideologicaly he is as conservative as Sarah Palin is on all of the issues, geographically he is from the most important battle ground state in American that being Ohio which is followed by Florida, and economically he was Bush budget director and incharge of the management and budget office. Rob Portman is the only Republican in this country that satisfies this 3 fold superior criteria of ideology, geography, and economy. Above all if I was the Republican candidate for President this year Rob Portman would have been my second choice after Sarah Palin. Your Conservative Right Wing Brother John Posted by: John Warren | November 11, 2008 at 05:19 PM Very lucid analysis John!! But the problem is this--hardly anyone outside Ohio knows who Rob Portman is; and secondly, we don't really NEED Ohio if we get Missouri, Nevada and New Mexico. I propose a Palin-Huckabee ticket. Here you have name recognition, star power in abundance, conservative ideology and a record of good governance. Palin-Huckabee 2012. What do you think? Posted by: Shawn Reycraft | November 12, 2008 at 12:34 AM Palin / Wurzelbacher 2012 - YES!!! Posted by: Millie | November 12, 2008 at 07:44 AM As a jew I truly do thank God that you did not make it to the White House. And as a woman, I thank you for doing so poorly in the public eye and helping so many to finalize their decisions. You truly are an insult to intelligent women. Posted by: Laurel Nokomis | November 19, 2008 at 08:08 PM And off to the side, this one was choice since I believe that sham engagement will come apart sooner than Florida Govenor Charlie Crists...
19 November 2008 in Campaign 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
19 November 2008 in Campaign 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
See Original Story & Listen To The Interview
Fresh Air from WHYY, November 18, 2008 · The name of former anti-war activist William Ayers was brought up twice in an attempt to discredit Barack Obama during the recent presidential campaign — first by Hillary Clinton, and then by the McCain campaign. Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin accused Obama — who served on two nonprofit boards with Ayers — of "palling around with terrorists."
The accusations stemmed from Ayers' involvement with the Weather Underground, a radical group responsible for bombings on the New York City Police Department headquarters in 1970, the U.S. Capitol building in 1971 and the Pentagon in 1972.
The federal case against Ayers was dismissed in the early 1970s.
Ayers is a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago and the author of Fugitive Days: Memoirs of an Anti-War Activist.
19 November 2008 in Campaign 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
The TARP has so far committed the following funding:
AIG $40 billion
JPMorgan $25 billion
Citigroup $25 billion
Wells Fargo $25 billion
Bank of America $15 billion
Merrill Lynch $10 billion
Goldman Sachs $10 billion
Morgan Stanley $10 billion
PNC Financial Services $7.7 billion
Bank of New York Mellon $3 billion
State Street Corp $2 billion
Capital One Financial $3.55 billion
Fifth Third Bancorp $3.45 billion
Regions Financial $3.5 billion
SunTrust Banks $3.5 billion
BB&T Corp $3.1 billion
KeyCorp $2.5 billion
Comerica $2.25 billion
Marshall & Ilsley Corp $1.7 billion
Northern Trust Corp $1.5 billion
Huntington Bancshares $1.4 billion
Zions Bancorp $1.4 billion
First Horizon National $866 million
City National Corp $395 million
Valley National Bancorp $330 million
UCBH Holdings Inc $298 million
Umpqua Holdings Corp $214 million
Washington Federal $200 million
First Niagara Financial $186 million
HF Financial Corp $25 million
Bank of Commerce $17 million
TOTAL: $203.08 billion
13 November 2008 in Economics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Laurel Nokomis On Woman Health Issues Laurel may be reached at FREELANCENEWSREPORT@juno.com This is the first in a series on drug safety, testing and reporting. After Merck was found to be holding contrary information to a drugs safety while in meetings with the FDA we Americans can readily see the passive attitude of the regulatory agency on the industry. Contrary test results are just one of the fraudulent considerations in drug safety. Improperly administered studies and falsified documentation are the tip of the iceberg. Currently we are in the heavily marketed cold and flu season. And one of the products being pushed is the flu shot. For years, especially starting with swine flu, Americans have flocked to the magic shot that woulld keep them from the misery of the flu. On the horizon we see the looming spectre of the Chinese Avian flu and the potential crossover for human to human replication transmission with disasterous results. In this interim, we American seek the magic shot that will save us from such fates. The scientific process in testing such entities includes the solidity of the design of the study and the study conduct itself. Science is based on factors including documentation as well as replication and reproduceabililty of results. Additionally, testing on applicable patient/subjects falls under this methodology. A nicotine patch may be tested in non smokers to evaluate clearance of the drug via the liver and other bodily organs in both healthy and compromised individuals. Combating nicotine craving may be carried out simultaenously on smokers and non smokers as well as between smokers with use of the drug and with a placebo. All testing approaches lend to the non influenced outcome of the data for the final decisions of efficacy and safety. One problem right of the bat is the testing population of clinical trials. For a drug largely intended for North American diet and lifestyle populations we have people participating in studies that are from third world countries that normally have a diet entirely different from that given during the study. An investigator from Chicago may not see anything wrong with using bratwurst in several meals during a study. However, South American participants that have a diet of mostly vegetables and corn meal may have altered dietary patterns and therefore shifting clearance results to name one potental "confounding" effect. Another factor in the testing of the drug is what is known as the wash out period. If a subject is in a study, usually they are not elegible to enter and dose in another study until a certain time period after their last clinical event from the prior study. Indigent populations are highly motivated for the cash received. There are people that are professional study subjects. Third world visitors receive a kings ransom for the amount of time in the study, and if using a fake ID, a tax free ransom. Often subjects show up for study evaluation exams with little more to identify themselves than a passport. Recently some testing firms have required forms for submission to the Internal Revenue to verify that the social security card presented matches the name with the number on file. Often these cards are unsigned and hence technically not valid. Potential subjects have been observed reading the name off the card as they sign consent forms for study participation. A staffer in one study reported that a subject reported with a new name and a new social security number than previous studies claiming the United States government gave her a new card, name and number once she got married. Many staffers are there to collect a paycheck and often pay little attention to such discrepencies or even if the examining physician has the correct chart during examination. The staffers that are diligent often meet with attitude when trying to manage the situation on the up and up. Currently in the cold and flu season, one flu vaccine that was tested at various facilities had at least one center that was not diligent in ensuring proper compliance to scientific standards. Outright fraud in the false production of study results was apparently swept under the table according to a confidential source. In particular the documentation of a testing center with a high hispanic staff and study population base was audited prior to submission to an FDA auditor. Among such questionable findgs which were often met with comments from superiors of "I wish you hadn't shown me that" included multiple individual subject urinanalysis forms prepared on days when the subject had not appeared for appointments or the use of outdated pregnancy test in the conduct of the study. While clerical errors abound and can be explained away as such, repeated "flaws" in the clinical procedure lends doubt to the due diligence on the part of the investigator, staff and company. Such clerical flaws occuring even 10% of the time starts to raise doubts on the other 90% of the study data and product safety. In clinical trials test drugs are adminstered on a random basis with the true nature of the drug being known to those not involved in the day to day conduct of the study. This helps to make sure that staffers and subjects aren't influenced in there perception of what was given and hence what results are expected. In the course of studies, subjects have symptoms. Any symptom, regardless of severity is documented as to type, severity and duration. Ever look at an ad for a drug in a magazine and the full page of tiny print on the following page that includes a heading "ADVERSE REACTIONS"? An Adverse Reaction Event is aymptom noted. The job of statiticians is to slush numbers and wash out those findings that are not statistically significant or "not determined mathematically to be a random and unrelated episode." There is one problem in this clinical scenario, it is subjective. By subjective I mean that study participants must report it or staffers must be astute enough to discern it is occuring. One source mentioned that an unlicensed nurse from South America was staffing a study that had her spouse as a subject. The spouse subject had passed out in his seat which can be common in this setting and is known as a vaso-vagal episode. When someone mentioned her spouses fainting, this nurse dismissed it as him taking a nap and returned to chatting with her female coworkers. Quality of education and training will be addressed in another installment. But, adverse events are the core findings desired in clinical trials. Without their being reported, we have no foundation for the safety of drugs. This can be compounded by secrecy. Secrecy due to a subject being currently enrolled in another study as can be the case with out patient trials or the refusal of the subject to report symptoms for fear of being dropped from the study and hence losing income. Another source told me that one such situation included a female subject with an apparently severe headache and exhibiting behavior of such by grimacing, keeping her eyes closed, taking ice from drinks to apply to her head and that the severity of her situation was largely ignored by staff from the prior shift. Upon approaching the subject to generate some documentation and suggesting that if symptoms were too severe she could stop participation she responded with "you tell us to tell you when we have pain but when we do you send us home and we lose money." These adverse reaction events are documented and are not "closed out" until symptoms cease. One subject with an ongoing reaction from one study was caught trying to qualify for another study. Recurrent study participants openly note on their qualifying paperwork that they had not been in a clinical study for a year when in fact they had just gone off study at the same facility a week earlier. The paperwork I am told is volumous and unless management and staff is on the lookout for such fraud it is seldom caught, but it is evident that it is largely ignored or even encouraged lest a test be short of it's study subject quota. If Chinese products don't kill us first, our ongoing greed no doubt will. To Be Continued... Is The Testing Of Prescribed Drugs Americans Take Done And Reported Honestly And Accurately?
10 November 2008 in Laurel Nokomis on Women's Health Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
08 November 2008 in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Or "I have the question here in my cue cards that I want to lie about."
by Laurel Nokomis freelancenewsreport@juno.com
Ok, so here I am darling, a die hard Republican. And "Oh Boy, a woman on the ticket!" That was as far as it got. If John McCain would have tapped Beth Dole, it may have been another story. Sacrifice the seat in North Carolina, what a great choice she would have been. And, yes, a better choice than John McCain. I pulled for Romney.
Romney and Dole would have been the ticket of my choice, not yet another embarrassing bimbo insulting my gender. Katie Couric, you were just too soft on her. Thanks for being nice, but... not one Supreme Court decision came to mind? Even if she could not recall the name of Lilly Ledbetter, perhaps she would have recalled the news about the hearing had she not been glued to Richard Roberts or CBN.
The last thing we need running this country is another dumb baby making overworked housewife pregnant and barefoot in the kitchen while her husband is off snowmobiling. Didn't anyone question the plane floating in the lake in front of her lakefront home? Oh she managed that by being frugal with the household budget. And after eight years of deception in the White House do we want a govenor that openly conducts gubernatorial business on private emails to thwart the legal process. I won't ask if she's stupid, I will merely say it. She is stupid. And, she is an insult to every hardworking American woman that struggles everyday to make ends meet and gain respect in a still predominately man's world. And, unfortunately there are still alot of impressionable stupid women out there considering how they went online to shop for her glasses, shoes and even got their hair dyed brown. Hey, all you girls out there, stop thiking with your uterus.
08 November 2008 in Laurel Nokomis on Women's Health Issues | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I think Sarah Palin learned how evenly matched she was with running mate John McCain. And, she shows up to do a concessoin speach and it is no go. It's the John show. Now, McCain lot seems to be trashing her. She served her purpose, and now she's trash. My only concern is that McCain has let another Katherine Harris loose. And this baying wolf was finally washed up. Hopefully it will be the same with Palin since she was dumb engough to swallow the McCain baloney hook, line and sinker. Harris started this whole mess, I think Palin finally got us out of it! Let's keep it that way.
08 November 2008 in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
11/4/2008 was a historic day. I decided to interview several and get their comments on why it was historic to them...
Download u_two_in_the_question_why_the_election_was_historic_1152008.mp3
08 November 2008 in You Too Interviews | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
This is the town where it started. Donora Pa. Grandmother was the secretary in the plumbing shop, Grandpap was a plumber. Joe Tunney, the original "Joe The Plumber." Here's a recent AP story on that town thirty years later...
The hillside in the distance is the same as the one behind the back of the photographer taking this photo. Just over the hill side behind the photographer is my home town of Belle Vernon Pa. Up until I graduated high school in 1974 nothing ever seemed to grow on that hillside. Here's the story:
Unveiling a Museum, a Pennsylvania Town Remembers the Smog That Killed 20 By SEAN D. HAMILL Published: November 1, 2008 DONORA, Pa. — When the killer smog rolled into town here in October 1948, 12-year-old Joann Crow thought it was an adventure. "Dad couldn’t drive us to school because it was so hard to see," said Mrs. Crow, now 72. "He had to walk us to school that Wednesday with a flashlight, which we thought was fun." But the next day, Thursday, Oct. 28, her grandmother, Susan Gnora, 62, started coughing and experiencing chest pains. It was the same for a lot of older residents of this Monongahela River valley mill town 24 miles southeast of Pittsburgh. "She died the next day. That’s when we all got worried," said Mrs. Crow, a retired child care worker. "They tried to blame it on asthma. But we knew that wasn’t true. She was always so strong. It was that smog from the mills." By the time a rain on Oct. 31 cleared the air, 20 people in Donora had died, and nearly half the town became ill in one of the worst air pollution disasters in the nation’s history. After decades of largely remaining silent about the horrors of that week, Donora residents began to open up about it in recent years, placing a historical marker in town on the 50th anniversary. Over the last two weeks, they marked the 60th anniversary with memorials for the families of those who died, discussions with experts about the lessons learned, and the opening of the Donora Smog Museum, with the slogan "Clean Air Started Here." "It was the first time that people really understood that a lot of air pollution in a short period of time could kill people," said Dr. Devra Davis, director of the Center for Environmental Oncology at the University of Pittsburgh and author of "When Smoke Ran Like Water," about air pollution. She is also a Donora native who was 2 at the time of the smog. The Donora smog gained national attention and helped lead to some of the first local and state pollution control laws, and, eventually, the 1970 federal Clean Air Act. "We want people to realize Donora was a big part of the environmental movement," said Don Pavelko, a Donora councilman who came up with idea for the museum. "The smog in Donora over the years had been looked upon as a black eye. The older folks just didn’t want to talk about it because they thought it was bad publicity." The museum, in a former Chinese restaurant, brings together photographs, old newspapers, maps and copies of studies of the smog. Brian Charlton, a high school history teacher, has been appointed archivist and is pursuing oral histories of that week. Paul C. Brown, 81, who worked in the steel mills then, remembered going to work at the mill that Saturday. "We all thought it would lift eventually, because we were used to the fog in the valley," he said. "Then I started to hear about people getting sick." Smog was not unusual in Donora, a town of 14,000 then that was home to the American Steel & Wire Company and the Donora Zinc Works plants — both run by the United States Steel Company — that sat along the river and employed 5,000 people. But this was different. The thick, yellowish, acrid smog was the result of an unusual weather inversion — a pocket of warm, stagnant air — that sat over the valley for five days. Underneath what was essentially a lid on the valley were sulfuric acid, nitrogen dioxide and other poisonous gases, including fluorine, that would normally rise into the atmosphere. Most researchers blame the zinc plant, which had long been a source of complaints and was responsible for the denuding of almost all vegetation within a half mile of the plant. The actual toll from the smog has never been accurately calculated. Dr. Davis said Donora’s mortality rate remained high for years afterward. "There are still lessons to be learned," Dr. Davis said. "There are situations like Donora going on in India and Asia right now." The plants both closed by 1966, and Donora is now a struggling town of 5,653. After the deadly smog, U.S. Steel said it was "an act of God," and never admitted any responsibility, even after it settled lawsuits filed against it for $250,000. By the time legal fees were taken out and the money was spread among the hundreds of victims — both those who died and those who got ill — "My aunt said she had enough left to buy a TV," Mrs. Crow said. "I just hope the memory of it helps somebody else," she said. "I hope we never hear of something like this happening again."
03 November 2008 in Serial Story Installment | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
03 November 2008 in Campaign 2008 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
03 November 2008 in Economics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
New health insurance program benefiting Floridians, Maybe?
New health insurance program benefiting Floridians, Maybe? Or, Who is getting the lions share of the health care dollar?
royjmeidinger@comcast.net
Fort Myers, Fl.
Governor Charlie Christ and the State Legislature have put the citizens of Florida in a partnership with the Health Industry Oligopoly, effective January 5th, 2009. The program, called Cover Florida, covers people ages 19 to 64 and is currently available to nearly 4 million un-insured people. The non-catastrophic plan costs around $50 a month. The catastrophic plan is about $150 but rates vary depending on age, gender, and benefit options.
The new insurance plan is supposed to give us affordable health insurance, cover the cost of drugs or give us a discount on drugs, but the price we will eventually pay is the end of the capitalistic health insurance system. The plan brings to light the true cost of what health insurance should cost. An employer presently pays $6,500 for an employees catastrophic coverage, as compared to $1,800 under the Cover Florida.
An employer who provides health insurance benefits can benefit from Cover Florida in the following manner. New employees can be covered immediately but for old employees the employer must cancel the employees coverage for six months; pay the employee an additional $200 a month or $2,400 a year, for them to buy Cover Florida health insurance and save $4,100 in employee benefits. The savings are even greater if the employer pays for family health insurance coverage, which is now costing $14,000 a year. For family health insurance coverage, the employer will increase the employee’s salary by $500 a month or $6,000 a year and save $8,000 a year in employee benefits. The employee will then have enough money to purchase an individual catastrophic coverage plan for their spouse and cover their children under Florida Kid Care Program.
Using the $1,800 figure as the base, the $6,500 is 3.6 times larger, which represents an additional cost of 260% going to the health insurance companies. The insurance companies premium rates are predicated on the billings they receive from the health care providers and not the actual amounts paid by the health insurance companies.
Compare this additional insurance expense to the capital costs and administrative costs of the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS), sent to Congress and verified by the General Accounting Office (GAO) of an additional expense of 1.5% above the health care costs paid to the health care providers and you can see why the American Employer is being ripped off.
There are another group of third-party payers who pay substantially more bill claims then the health insurance companies or the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services, these are the credit card companies, like VISA, MasterCard and Discover; these companies get paid 4% to 6% of the billed amount, but they have to pay quickly and take the risk of bad debt from people who do not pay.
Also when you compare the percent of the Gross Domestic Product for health care with that of other countries, you see we are spending two (2) to three (3) times as much, as other countries, But the kicker to all of this is our health care system is ranked 41st by the World Health Organization.
The cost savings of the plan is due to the fact the Cover Florida policyholders are coerced into using the insurance companies’ in-network health care providers. Most of these in-network health care providers pay a consideration, which is a percentage of their fees, a brokering fee, to the insurance companies for referring their policyholders. These payments are quite substantial for the health care providers, for example Lee Memorial Health System’s largest expenditure is close to $500 million dollars in brokering fees. In the past, the IRS did not require a tax exempt organization like Lee Memorial Health System to report their brokering fees, because they are illegal, but do to a new IRS regulation, LMSB-04-0807-056, Industry Director Directive on Contractual Allowance Issues in the Healthcare Industry, they must now be reported and the insurance companies must pay taxes on these brokering fees. For the tax paying health care providers, for any consideration given, like secret discounts given to the insurance companies, they will also have to pay taxes on these amounts, because the consideration paid for an illegal act like brokering are not a deductible expense item.
There is one point I know you have to take into consideration, the new plan calls for a co-payment of 20%, but many of the new health care plans being sold today to employers also call for a co-payment of 20%. The Cover Florida policyholder has to pay a 20% co-payment for an in-network health care provider, who normally pays a brokering fee to the insurance company but now must pay a 40% co-payment to the insurance company because the insurance company is not getting a brokering fee. This is coercion and a limitation on competition, sanctioned by State legislation; if a policyholder does not boycott the out-of-network health care provider the out of pocket expense for the policyholder is twice as much. An important fact to remember, the co-payment is a billable item from the insurance company, not from the health care provider. You should pay the co-payment to the insurance company to establish a contractual relationship, so if anything goes wrong with your medical procedures you are not limited to whom you can sue for medical malpractice. You can also sue the insurance company, for using their in-network health care provider. Unlike the State created tax exempt organizations which have limits on medical malpractice settlements, there are no limits on insurance companies settlements awarded by juries. Get an invoice from the insurance company for the co-payment; pay the insurance company, not the health care provider.
The $4,100 to $8,000 savings the employer saves could be used to save jobs, increase profits or give substantial raises to the employees. This would be a greater stimulus package then Congress is going to try to pass.
10 January 2009 in Reader Contribution/Commentary | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)